Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:14:43 -0900
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:15:28 -0800 (PST), "Ken S. Tucker"
<dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 13, 2:50 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:39:36 -0800 (PST), "Ken S. Tucker"
<dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 12, 4:04 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 12, 1:08 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[junk]
All I wanted from you is for you to show your derivation of the
supposed solution to the field equations.
For those conversant in the subject, I've
done that. Read Weinberg's QFT ref provided
then get back to us, and tell me if he's
right or wrong.
Ken
....
We aren't talking about Weinberg,
Yes we are, answer the question.
Ken
Every time you refuse to show the derivation it simply proves again
and again there is no derivation.
.
- References:
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.
- Prev by Date: Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
- Next by Date: Re: GR1916, available online.
- Previous by thread: Re: GR1916, available online.
- Next by thread: Re: GR1916, available online.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
