sci.physics.relativity

Date Index

Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?, Ken S. Tucker
Bad at Math, golfmyball
- Re: Bad at Math, Sue...
- Re: Bad at Math, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Bad at Math, Niblick
"The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations", Mret
The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Albertito
- Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Androcles
  - Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Albertito
    - Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Androcles
- Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Kapowski
  - Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Albertito
- Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, dlzc
- Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Tom Roberts
Re: M'I-5 P ersecution Harassm ent th rough the Rad io, Don Stockbauer
What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
- Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Randy Poe
  - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
    - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Randy Poe
    - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Androcles
    - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
    - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Randy Poe
    - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
  - Message not available
    - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Bill Hobba
- Message not available
  - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Jeckyl
- Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Bill Hobba
- Message not available
  - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Bill Hobba
- Re: What are physicists trying to do?, xxein
  - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
- Message not available
  - Re: What are physicists trying to do?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Daily Nostrums
- Re: What are physicists trying to do?, John Schutkeker
Quiz, Simple Simon
- Re: Quiz, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
    - Re: Quiz, Dono
    - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
    - Re: Quiz, George Hammond
    - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
    - Re: Quiz, George Hammond
    - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
    - Re: Quiz, George Hammond
    - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
- Re: Quiz, Martin Hogbin
  - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
- Re: Quiz, George Hammond
  - Re: Quiz, George Hammond
- Re: Quiz, Dono
  - Re: Quiz, Dono
  - Re: Quiz, George Hammond
- Re: Quiz, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
  - Re: Quiz, Dono
    - Re: Quiz, Tom Roberts
    - Re: Quiz, Dono
    - Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
  - Re: Quiz, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Quiz, adam . trepczynski
  - Re: Quiz, Dono
    - Re: Quiz, adam . trepczynski
Flat => Curved Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Flat => Curved Spacetime, xxein
Re: Dark energy: the decade ahead (12 screens, 7 sketches), Factotum
johnreed Take 24 - What is Super Electromagnetic 'Gravitation'?, johnlawrencereedjr
Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electromagnetic Universe?, johnlawrencereedjr
"Retic Postings and SPAM", Tuo
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", JanPB
  - Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", xray4abc
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING, optical . supercomputing
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Tuo
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", bernardZ
  - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Att of Tom Roberts, Juan R.
Tansverse mass, xray4abc
- Re: Tansverse mass, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  - Re: Tansverse mass, xray4abc
    - Re: Tansverse mass, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: Tansverse mass, fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Tansverse mass, xray4abc
- Re: Tansverse mass, Pmb
  - Re: Tansverse mass, xray4abc
Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
- Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Sue...
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dono
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Sue...
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
- Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Koobee Wublee
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dono
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
- Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dono
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
  - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, PD
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, PD
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, PD
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
- Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Martin Hogbin
after the logical refutation: what next?, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Dono
- Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, dlzc
  - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Don Stockbauer
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, dlzc
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, dlzc
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
- Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
- Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
  - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
- Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jerry
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
  - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
  - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
  - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Daryl McCullough
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
SR & perpendicular motion, David
- Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Eric Gisse
  - Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Martin Hogbin
    - Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Paul Cardinale
    - Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR & perpendicular motion, The Ghost In The Machine
  - Re: SR & perpendicular motion, David
"A Snapshot of a Photon", Tuo
SR & irreversible processes, David
- Re: SR & irreversible processes, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: SR & irreversible processes, David
    - Re: SR & irreversible processes, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR & irreversible processes, dlzc
- Re: SR & irreversible processes, Juan R.
  - Re: SR & irreversible processes, Dirk Van de moortel
5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, elsiemelsi
- Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, Don Stockbauer
  - Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, dlzc
    - Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, xxein
- Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, Bill Hobba
Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Josef Matz
- Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, dlzc
  - Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Eric Gisse
why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, fungus
- <Possible follow-ups>
- why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, fungus
  - Re: why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, fungus
the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: the logical refutation, shuba
  - Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
  - Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
- Re: the logical refutation, bernardZ
- Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: the logical refutation, Sue...
- Re: the logical refutation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  - Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
- Re: the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  - Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: the logical refutation, dlzc
  - Re: the logical refutation, shuba
  - Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
- Re: the logical refutation, Tom Roberts
  - Re: the logical refutation, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: the logical refutation, bernardZ
- Re: the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  - Re: the logical refutation, dlzc
  - Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
    - Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: the logical refutation, Paul Cardinale
  - Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
    - Re: the logical refutation, Paul Cardinale
    - Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
    - Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: the logical refutation, Koobee Wublee
- Re: the logical refutation, Dono
- Re: the logical refutation, Daryl McCullough
Twins travel effect, roberto neves
- Re: Twins travel effect, Dono
  - Re: Twins travel effect, roberto neves
    - Re: Twins travel effect, Dono
- Re: Twins travel effect, Sue...
  - Re: Twins travel effect, roberto neves
    - Re: Twins travel effect, Sue...
    - Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
    - Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
  - Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
- Re: Twins travel effect, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins travel effect, xxein
- Re: Twins travel effect, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
  - Re: Twins travel effect, Dirk Van de moortel
"The Source of Gravitational Energy", Tuo
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Tuo
- Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", JanPB
Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
- Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Juan R.
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Juan R.
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
- Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
- Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Martin Hogbin
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, xxein
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, xxein
- Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
  - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
    - Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
Should we admit anti-space if we admit anti-matter?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Should we admit anti-space if we admit anti-matter?, Eric Gisse
Re: I am confused by relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: I am confused by relativity, Pmb
  - Re: I am confused by relativity, Tom Roberts
    - Re: I am confused by relativity, maxwell
    - Re: I am confused by relativity, Tom Roberts
  - Re: I am confused by relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), rob
- Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Androcles
  - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Eric Gisse
  - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Jeckyl
- Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Eric Gisse
  - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Rob
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
- Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
- Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
  - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), rob
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Eric Gisse
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Rob
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Rob
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
Re: Josephmas, Jong Kim
- Re: Josephmas, Jeckyl
- Re: Josephmas, Dono
Time dilation reduces speed, Peri of Pera
- Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Jeckyl
- Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Dono
  - Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Jeckyl
- Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Sue...
  - Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Jeckyl
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Cino
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Cino
on-line courtesy, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: on-line courtesy, Bill Hobba
  - Re: on-line courtesy, Martin Hogbin
  - Re: on-line courtesy, Bryan Olson
- Re: on-line courtesy, Androcles
  - Re: on-line courtesy, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: on-line courtesy, Eric Gisse
- Re: on-line courtesy, George Hammond
SR: how well proved it really is, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: how well proved it really is, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: how well proved it really is, Bill Hobba
- Message not available
  - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Bryan Olson
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Bryan Olson
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Jeckyl
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Tom Roberts
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Bill Hobba
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Androcles
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Androcles
- Re: how well proved it really is, Jeckyl
- Message not available
  - Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Jeckyl
- Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Dono
Replies on SR, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Replies on SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Replies on SR, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
  - Message not available
    - Re: Replies on SR, Androcles
- Re: Replies on SR, Bryan Olson
  - Re: Replies on SR, Androcles
What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, THE_ONE
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, THE_ONE
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Randy Poe
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dono
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Daily Nostrums
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, THE_ONE
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Martin Hogbin
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, RP
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
- Message not available
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
- Message not available
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Randy Poe
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dono
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Androcles
    - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Sue...
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, John C . Polasek
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
- Message not available
  - Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
a few questions about SR and its adherents, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Eric Gisse
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Bill Hobba
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Sue...
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Koobee Wublee
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Dono
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Bryan Olson
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Jeckyl
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Juan R.
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Tom Roberts
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
    - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Bill Hobba
    - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Sue...
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Eric Gisse
    - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Eric Gisse
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Androcles
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Alen
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Paul B. Andersen
  - Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Androcles
Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
  - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Jeckyl
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Jeckyl
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Pmb
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Cino
A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Craig Franck
- Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
  - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
  - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Sue...
  - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
  - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
- Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Martin Hogbin
  - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
    - Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
Statement of Purpose Space Masters, faizabedin
- Re: Statement of Purpose Space Masters, xxein
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, Cino
- Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, xxein
- Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, vanep
- Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, JanPB
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Cino
Re: Special Relativity paradox?, Don Stockbauer
What happens to this laser with SR?, David
- Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Sue...
- Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, PD
  - Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, David
  - Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Androcles
    - Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, PD
    - Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Androcles
    - Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, PD
    - Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Androcles
johnreed - take 24 - super electromagnetism, johnlawrencereedjr
Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
- Message not available
  - Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
    - Message not available
    - Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
    - Message not available
    - Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
    - Message not available
    - Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, Dono
Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
- Message not available
  - Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
    - Message not available
    - Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
    - Message not available
    - Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
    - Message not available
    - Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
    - Message not available
    - Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Cino
Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Dono
  - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Don Stockbauer
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, takecool
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Dono
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Jeckyl
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, takecool
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
Re: New & Improved Relativity Paradox...???, The Translucent Amoebae
relativity and permanence, VinegarTasters@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: relativity and permanence, Jeckyl
- Re: relativity and permanence, dlzc
Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
- Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Don Stockbauer
  - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Androcles
- Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
- Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, dlzc
  - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Androcles
- Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Androcles
- Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
  - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Shubee
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Randy Poe
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Shubee
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Shubee
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Juan R.
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, shuba
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Dono
  - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Sue...
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Sue...
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
- Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, PD
  - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, PD
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, PD
I can do that!, PD
- Re: I can do that!, Androcles
  - Re: I can do that!, Jeckyl
- Re: I can do that!, harry
"The Nature of Mass", Cino
Re: Magnetic Field During Motion, Simple Simon
- Re: Magnetic Field During Motion, mL
  - Re: Magnetic Field During Motion, mL
SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, David
- Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Dono
  - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Tom Roberts
- Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Sue...
  - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Jeckyl
- Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Randy Poe
  - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Androcles
    - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Jeckyl
- Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, PD
  - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, David
    - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, PD
  - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Randy Poe
    - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Tom Roberts
    - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Randy Poe
    - Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Androcles
Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
- Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
  - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Eric Gisse
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, harry
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, harry
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Sue...
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jerry
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Sue...
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Sue...
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, harry
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jerry
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, bz
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, bz
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jerry
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
- Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
  - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
  - Message not available
    - Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
"Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Sue...
- Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  - Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Sue...
- Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", kenseto
  - Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Eric Gisse
Hi to ALL. I just join this group., cletaarman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Pmb
  - Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
    - Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
    - Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Irev
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sancho's Atomic Trousers
Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Jeckyl
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Irev
This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Don Stockbauer
  - Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Harold Saxon
    - Re: This group is a good place to sleep, atomik . fungus
    - Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
    - Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  - Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Irev
- Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Igor
Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Pmb
Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
- Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
  - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Bill Hobba
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Bill Hobba
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Dono
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
- Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Irev
Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  - Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., Eric Gisse
    - Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., Eric Gisse
Evren ; Bir varmış bir yokmuş gibi yaşar.!, resneli
"Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Irev
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Don Stockbauer
  - Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", bernardZ
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Irev
design of ic engine, bhargava
- Re: design of ic engine, Jeckyl
  - Re: design of ic engine, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: design of ic engine, Sue...
- Re: design of ic engine, Abonito
Running machine with an ic engine, bhargava
- Re: Running machine with an ic engine, Abonito
Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, John Jones
- Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, oriel36
    - Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Bill Hobba
    - Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, oriel36
    - Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Bill Hobba
    - Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, oriel36
- Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Tom Roberts
Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
  - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
    - Re: God is a Curva?, shuba
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
    - Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, RLG
- Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, harry
  - Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, shuba
    - Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, Androcles
    - Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, harry
    - Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, shuba
    - Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet, harry
Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Pmb
- Message not available
  - Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Dono
- Message not available
  - Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, PD
- Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Randy Poe
- Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Dono
- Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Igor
The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, John Jones
- Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, Eric Gisse
- Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, Bill Hobba
  - Message not available
    - Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, Bill Hobba
  - Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, John Jones
    - Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, Bill Hobba
- Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, Tom Roberts
  - Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces, John Jones
"Gravity", Sptth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Gravity", Irev
  - Re: "Gravity", The Ghost In The Machine
- "Gravity", Tuo
Principle of Relativity, Sue...
- Re: Principle of Relativity, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Principle of Relativity, paparios@xxxxxxxxx
  - Re: Principle of Relativity, Sue...
- Re: Principle of Relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
  - Re: Principle of Relativity, Androcles
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, Androcles
- Re: Principle of Relativity, Jeckyl
  - Re: Principle of Relativity, RP
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, Sue...
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, Jeckyl
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, Androcles
    - Re: Principle of Relativity, Jeckyl
is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?, conducter
- Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?, Randy Poe
- Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?, Igor
  - Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?, conducter
    - Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?, Igor
    - Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?, Eric Gisse
"Communicating at Translight Velocities", Sptth
what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bhargava
- Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bz
- Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, Martin Hogbin
  - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, fungus
    - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
    - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bhargava
    - Message not available
    - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
  - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bz
    - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, bz
- Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?, RP
Trans-Dimensional Theory, Sanders Kaufman
- Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory, Ken S. Tucker
  - Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory, Sanders Kaufman
    - Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory, Bill Hobba
  - Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory, Sanders Kaufman
    - Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory, Bill Hobba
these selfestablished phylosophs in this thread here needs a computer program help them not to read, scratch
Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, David
- Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
  - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, David
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, mL
- Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, dlzc
- Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Eric Gisse
- Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
  - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
- Message not available
  - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Jerry
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
- Message not available
  - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
  - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, bz
- Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Tom Roberts
  - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Jeckyl
  - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Tom Roberts
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR, Tom Roberts
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Sptth
- Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
  - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Dono
- Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
  - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Tom Roberts
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Jeckyl
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Jeckyl
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Jeckyl
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Jeckyl
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Jeckyl
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", dlzc
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", AKGMJC
    - Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Androcles
- Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Dono
Re: The Voice of Hurricanes, Jong Kim
Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Leonard Abbott
- Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, harry
- Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Androcles
  - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, J.Smas2777
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Androcles
- Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Pmb
  - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Don Stockbauer
  - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Message not available
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Dono
- Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,, Jeckyl
- Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, JanPB
  - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Stamenin
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Dono
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Don Stockbauer
    - Message not available
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Stamenin
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Dono
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Dono
    - Message not available
    - Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,, Jeckyl
Re: Yet another Sagnac animation., Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Yet another Sagnac animation., bz
  - Message not available
    - Re: Yet another Sagnac animation., Eric Gisse
  - Message not available
    - Re: Yet another Sagnac animation., YBM
  - Message not available
    - Re: Yet another Sagnac animation., bz
Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Androcles
- Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, The Ghost In The Machine
  - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Androcles
    - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Androcles
    - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Androcles
- Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Koobee Wublee
  - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Androcles
  - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Paul B. Andersen
    - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites, Tom Roberts
Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Baird
THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Stamenin
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Stamenin
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Stamenin
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dono
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Stamenin
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Eric Gisse
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Stamenin
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Stamenin
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dono
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Tom Roberts
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, THE_ONE
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
- Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, The Ghost In The Machine
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, The Ghost In The Machine
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
- Message not available
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Tom Roberts
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, The Ghost In The Machine
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
- Message not available
  - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, PD
    - Message not available
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, PD
    - Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Androcles
Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
- Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
  - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Androcles
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
- Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Sue...
  - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Sanders Kaufman
- Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Androcles
- Re: Zero Time Conundrum, dlzc
  - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Sue...
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Sue...
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Zero Time Conundrum, harry
- Re: Zero Time Conundrum, PD
  - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, harry
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, harry
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Androcles
    - Re: Zero Time Conundrum, Jeckyl
Re: THREE PROBLEMS FOR MATH AND SCIENCE (is Copyrighted.), Sanders Kaufman
how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?, scratch
- Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?, JanPB
  - Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?, scratch
Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?, oriel36
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?, Pmb
is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
- Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, PD
  - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, xxein
  - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, PD
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, PD
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, PD
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, PD
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
  - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, Pmb
- Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, JanPB
  - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
    - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, JanPB
- Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, Pmb
  - Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?, scratch
how does the information of being attracted excape a black hole?, scratch
- Re: how does the information of being attracted excape a black hole?, Tom Roberts
  - Re: how does the information of being attracted excape a black hole?, scratch
Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, Jim Black
- Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, GSS
  - Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, Jim Black
    - Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, GSS
    - Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, Jim Black
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, Jim Black
- Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity, Eric Gisse
"The Einstein Hoax", Sptth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "The Einstein Hoax", Cino
Re: ///// *♥*Honey Moon Sex Videos**Live Cam Sex *♥* \\\\\, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- Re: ///// *♥*Honey Moon Sex Videos**Live Cam Sex *♥* \\\\\, bhargava
Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Juan R.
- Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR? (second part), Juan R.
- Re: Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Juan R.
  - Re: Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Androcles
Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., GSS
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Bill Hobba
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., maxwell
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Androcles
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Bill Hobba
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Bill Hobba
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Bill Hobba
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Bill Hobba
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Androcles
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., bz
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., bz
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., bz
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., bz
  - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Tom Roberts
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., maxwell
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., oriel36
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., oriel36
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., maxwell
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Sue...
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Androcles
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., bz
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Sue...
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., maxwell
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Pmb
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., maxwell
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., oriel36
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Sue...
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Sue...
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., oriel36
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., oriel36
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., John Kennaugh
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Jeckyl
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
    - Re: Physical interpretation in physics., oriel36
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., harry
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics., Dono
what are they using to describe evolution other than partial differential equations?, jolt
- Re: what are they using to describe evolution other than partial differential equations?, Jeckyl
how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, jolt
- Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  - Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, scratch
    - Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  - Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, bhargava
    - Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, Androcles
    - Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?, bhargava
what gives absence of vacuum, boho
- Re: what gives absence of vacuum, bhargava
  - Re: what gives absence of vacuum, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  - Re: what gives absence of vacuum, scratch
    - Re: what gives absence of vacuum, bhargava
    - Re: what gives absence of vacuum, scratch
friction from vacuum, boho
- Re: friction from vacuum, bhargava
- Re: friction from vacuum, bhargava
relativity predict eternal motion, boho
- Re: relativity predict eternal motion, PD
  - Re: relativity predict eternal motion, jolt
    - Re: relativity predict eternal motion, PD
    - Re: relativity predict eternal motion, jolt
    - Re: relativity predict eternal motion, PD
"Is There a Force of Gravity?", Sptth
SR & optical properties, David
- Re: SR & optical properties, dlzc
- Re: SR & optical properties, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR & optical properties, Tom Roberts
  - Re: SR & optical properties, David
Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
- Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Relic neutrinos, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Message not available
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Relic neutrinos, mluttgens
Simon G Best, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Simon G Best, Simon G Best
  - Re: Simon G Best, Martin Hogbin
California Moving Companies Los Angeles Movers 323-678-2704, movers
"The Error in Relativistic Physics", Evig
- Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Dono
Re: How many dimensions are there?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?, K_h
  - Re: How many dimensions are there?, Gerald L. O'Barr
    - Re: How many dimensions are there?, Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How many dimensions are there?, Jeckyl
  - Re: How many dimensions are there?, Gerald L. O'Barr
    - Re: How many dimensions are there?, Jeckyl
relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
- Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Androcles
- Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
  - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), John Park
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Eric Gisse
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
  - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
- Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Dono
  - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
    - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Ken S. Tucker
- Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Tom Roberts
  - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), Juan R.
  - Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames), srwenner
Re: Question about time dilation, Tom Roberts
- Re: Question about time dilation, Koobee Wublee
  - Re: Question about time dilation, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Question about time dilation, Randy Poe
  - Re: Question about time dilation, harry
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Jeckyl
    - Re: Question about time dilation, Eric Gisse
Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY, Jim Black
- Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY, George Hammond
  - Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY, Jim Black
    - Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY, George Hammond
    - Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY, Jim Black
Re: Calculazions within a inertial system., Josef Matz
- Re: Calculazions within a inertial system., Androcles
how is speed of light constant when it can fly slower?, rotten egg
- Re: how is speed of light constant when it can fly slower?, Igor
- Re: how is speed of light constant when it can fly slower?, The Ghost In The Machine
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Evig
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Cino
  - Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Don Stockbauer
    - Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", JanPB
  - Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", takecool
    - Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Jeckyl
Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted", The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?, coil
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?, Bryan Olson
  - Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?, Androcles
- Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?, Sanders Kaufman
Galileo and Copernicus, oriel36
Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., Martin Hogbin
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., oriel36
  - Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., Martin Hogbin
    - Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., John Kennaugh
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., John Kennaugh
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., harry
  - Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., Androcles
    - Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative., oriel36
Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, scratch
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, shuba
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Androcles
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dono
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, mL
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Androcles
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Josef Matz
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Igor
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Igor
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, xray4abc
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, PD
    - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
- Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Sue...
  - Re: Is the LT for time correct?, Jeckyl
Re: Frame question, Peri of Pera
- Re: Frame question, dlzc
  - Re: Frame question, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Frame question, dlzc
- Re: Frame question, Androcles
  - Re: Frame question, Peri of Pera
    - Re: Frame question, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Frame question, Androcles
    - Message not available
    - Re: Frame question, Androcles
- Re: Frame question, oriel36
Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Simon G Best
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Tom Roberts
  - Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, oriel36
  - Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Simon G Best
- Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Simon G Best
  - Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Paul Cardinale
  - Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Simon G Best
- Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Paul Cardinale
  - Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Androcles
- Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, Simon G Best
  - Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?, harry
Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online., Alen
  - Re: GR1916, available online., Tom Roberts
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Sue...
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Sue...
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Sue...
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Tom Roberts
    - Re: GR1916, available online., John Park
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Tom Roberts
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Tom Roberts
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., John Park
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., John Park
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., John Park
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., bz
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., bz
    - Re: GR1916, available online., John Park
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., JanPB
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Androcles
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Sue...
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Pmb
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Pmb
    - Re: GR1916, available online., bz
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Koobee Wublee
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Androcles
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Alen
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Tom Roberts
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Alen
    - Re: GR1916, available online., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: GR1916, available online., Alen
    - Re: GR1916, available online., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    - Re: GR1916, available online., bz
- Re: GR1916, available online., Tom Roberts
  - Re: GR1916, available online., Ken S. Tucker
Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted", dlzc
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted", Martin Hogbin
  - Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted", coil
Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, shalayka
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Dono
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Dono
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, shalayka
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Dono
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, shalayka
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, shalayka
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jerry
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Dono
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Ken S. Tucker
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, drhorton
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Koobee Wublee
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, JMA
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Baird
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Koobee Wublee
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, dr_strangelove
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jerry
  - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jerry
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jerry
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jeckyl
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jeckyl
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jerry
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Jerry
    - Re: Orbital precession w/o GR, Androcles
Re: The real real twin paradox., colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
  - Re: The real real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
  - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
  - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Sue...
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Sue...
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Sue...
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
  - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Dono
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
  - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Eric Gisse
    - Re: GR1916 question about g=1?, Ken S. Tucker
Re: The real twin paradox., bz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The real twin paradox., bz
  - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
  - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
  - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., G
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., G
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., G
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Laurent
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Message not available
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Jeckyl
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
  - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Dono
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Bryan Olson
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Cosmik de Bris
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Daryl McCullough
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., paparios@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Dono
    - Re: The real twin paradox., colp
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox., colp
- Re: The real twin paradox., bz
  - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...
    - Re: The real twin paradox., bz
    - Re: The real twin paradox., Sue...