sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
  • From: Albertito
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: why the ireversibility and the passage of time went backwards before year 0000 ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
  • From: Dono
• Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Dono
• "Causality"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Medicine Center and Wellness Circle - Pharmacy Practioner Leadership
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why the ireversibility and the passage of time went backwards before year 0000 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: snapdragon31
• any body wants books on physics
  • From: aksnitjsr2k3
• Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: DIVINE ALBERT, POINCARE, NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY
  • From: Dono
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: YBM
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: xxein
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Stupidest Moron Award 2008" - till now nominations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: why the ireversibility and the passage of time went backwards before year 0000 ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Stupidest Moron Award 2008" - till now nominations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dono
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: Ockham
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: harry
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: xxein
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: YBM
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: Ockham
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: YBM
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: YBM
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: xxein
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: xxein
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: xxein
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: PD
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Direct observation of length contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Ockham
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: harry
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: kenseto
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Vres
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Dono
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: PD
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: harry
• Any Body wants some good books
  • From: aksnitjsr2k3
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Ockham
• Re: where is the missing time saved?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: enders
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Igor
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: oriel36
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Medical Practice Software Simplifies The EMR Process
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Vres
• Are there any civil anti-relativists?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: mL
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: wugi
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: Per
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
  • From: maxwell
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: wugi
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The truth behind the Nimtz experiments - Relativity spacetime a fiction ?
  • From: enders
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• New Paper technology in our world :
  • From: shareha
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: Daniel A. Thomas
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bz
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ... The Gift of Power, Discovery of DIVINE Creation!
  • From: MTwain
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: C . felis
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Basic Design of a Hyperspace Engine
  • From: Robert Morpheal, Robert Ezergailis, Morphealism
• Re: Query to JanPB
  • From: George Hammond
• Hyperbolic Doubly-Special Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation -added word
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Dawn of Applied Biology
  • From: Jong Kim
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Simple model for Gravity that gives an explaination to "Dirac's large number hypothesis".
  • From: TELETRANSMISSIONSTEORI
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation -added word
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Ockham
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• The Reason for Time Dilation
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: xxein
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: Dono
• Kerr describes the history of his metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: anjum1us
• Re: Query to JanPB
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Query to JanPB
  • From: GSS
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Rotation and Sagnac
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Query to JanPB
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Query to JanPB
  • From: Peter Bowditch
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dono
• large tex: The current version of my ether theory
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Rotation and Sagnac
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Rotation and Sagnac
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Query to JanPB
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Space Shuttle Discovery (Full Stack) Model Spacecraft
  • From: aircraftsmodel@xxxxxxxxx
• Albertito fails a simple algebraic test; was: Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: YBM
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: kenseto
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Dumb question about light that took 15B years to get here
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Dumb question about light that took 15B years to get here
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Alen
• Re: Dumb question about light that took 15B years to get here
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Jeckyl
• Dumb question about light that took 15B years to get here
  • From: tsreyb@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Alen
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why relativity don't give me instant satisfaction?
  • From: PD
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: why relativity don't give me instant satisfaction?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: bz
• Re: Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: bz
• Is there life beyond Relativity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why relativity don't give me instant satisfaction?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Hammond and God
  • From: Jeckyl
• Hammond and God
  • From: Alen
• Re: why relativity don't give me instant satisfaction?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A Message of Equality (for Hammond, Wilson et al)
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: bz
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why relativity don't give me instant satisfaction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A Message of Equality (for Hammond, Wilson et al)
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Rethinking the Equivalence Principle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The truth behind the Nimtz experiments - Relativity spacetime a fiction ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A Message of Equality (for Hammond, Wilson et al)
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: simple question
  • From: Pishta
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Message of Equality (for Hammond, Wilson et al)
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dr. Henri Wilson Saves the Struggling Hammond
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Dr. Henri Wilson Saves the Struggling Hammond
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Rotation and Sagnac
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A Message of Equality (for Hammond, Wilson et al)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• A Message of Equality (for Hammond, Wilson et al)
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Dr. Henri Wilson Saves the Struggling Hammond
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Dr. Henri Wilson Saves the Struggling Hammond
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Rotation and Sagnac
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: simple question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Dr. Henri Wilson Saves the Struggling Hammond
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The truth behind the Nimtz experiments - Relativity spacetime a fiction ?
  • From: enders
• Re: simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: simple question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Igor
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: simple question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: simple question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: simple question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple question
  • From: Pishta
• Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.
  • From: Vird
• Re: simple question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Vird
• simple question
  • From: Pishta
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why relativity is falsified by quantum computers?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: relativity wrong, ufo are real, once again
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity wrong, ufo are real, once again
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: relativity wrong, ufo are real, once again
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Igor
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why no stars can be seen from moon
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Albertito
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Vird
• Pioneer anomaly
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about protons and electrons
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: walawelo
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Igor
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Vird
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: bz
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: GOOD MORNING :
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Randy Poe
• GOOD MORNING :
  • From: sweetdeep.15340@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Poe's missing homework
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Poe's missing homework
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Using the star/proton model to evaluate the cancellation of gravitation
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Poe's missing homework
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using the star/proton model to evaluate the cancellation of gravitation
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Poe's missing homework
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Where physics went wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Poe's missing homework
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Poe's missing homework
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Albertito
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Where physics went wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: One comment on my article.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein forgets his cuckoo malformations
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Vird
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: mL
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about protons and electrons
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A special note of thanks
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: One comment on my article.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about protons and electrons
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: Question about protons and electrons
  • From: PD
• A special note of thanks
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: PD
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Question about protons and electrons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Dono
• Question about protons and electrons
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• question about spacetime and black holes
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Androcles
• GR hallucination on the extra Mercury's perihelion precession
  • From: Albertito
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Our universes laws of physics
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: xxein
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Our universes laws of physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Our universes laws of physics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: PD
• Re: One comment on my article.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Our universes laws of physics
  • From: PD
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our universes laws of physics
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our universes laws of physics
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: PD
• Our universes laws of physics
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Using the star/proton model to evaluate the cancellation of gravitation
  • From: Igor
• Re: Simple answers to so called great mysteries
  • From: Wazflam the imperrigable
• An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: PD
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: PD
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: PD
• Re: The truth behind the Nimtz experiments - Relativity spacetime a fiction ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: dlzc
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Vird
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Roberts, Andersen and Jerry - plus minders - Achieve World Shattering Discovery.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: PD
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: PD
• One comment on my article.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: mL
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: harry
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Using the star/proton model to evaluate the cancellation of gravitation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Contraction Dilemma
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: bz
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Dono
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Using the star/proton model to evaluate the cancellation of gravitation
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: YBM
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: unvlet
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: drhorton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Creation, The Big Bang, omnipetence not required
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: The truth behind the Nimtz experiments - Relativity spacetime a fiction ?
  • From: enders
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: YBM
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Group-Moderator
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Obni
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: WARNING --- Please Read
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Roberts, Andersen and Jerry - plus minders - Achieve World Shattering Discovery.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WARNING --- Please Read
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WARNING --- Please Read
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
  • From: G
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• WARNING --- Please Read
  • From: Group-Moderator
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Understanding Relativity; was Re: to everyone
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: My opinion about philosophy of physics and religion.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: My opinion about philosophy of physics and religion.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• My opinion about philosophy of physics and religion.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Obni
• The truth behind the Nimtz experiments - Relativity spacetime a fiction ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: mL
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: bz
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: mL
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pound Rebka
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Understanding Relativity; was Re: to everyone
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Some real Dingleberies
  • From: dlzc
• Some real Dingleberies
  • From: mL
• Re: Understanding Relativity; was Re: to everyone
  • From: JanPB
• why does science conflict with religion?
  • From: walawelo
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Dono
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Only 11 mm LED slim light box--Http://www.edlite.hk
  • From: jenny
• "Gravity"
  • From: Obni
• Re: Roberts, Andersen and Jerry - plus minders - Achieve World Shattering Discovery.
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Androcles
• Can Black Holes move?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Navia and Augusto new "discoveries"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Roberts, Andersen and Jerry - plus minders - Achieve World Shattering Discovery.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Roberts, Andersen and Jerry - plus minders - Achieve World Shattering Discovery.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Navia and Augusto new "discoveries"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Understanding Relativity; was Re: to everyone
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Meson Hoax
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Roberts, Andersen and Jerry - plus minders - Achieve World Shattering Discovery.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Navia and Augusto new "discoveries"
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ... The Gift of Power, Discovery of DIVINE Creation!
  • From: MTwain
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Navia and Augusto new "discoveries"
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Obni
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Paul Andersen Discovers a new Species of Fairy.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: How fast is time? Light's clock
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Meson Hoax
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: The TimeLord
• ... The Gift of Power, Discovery of DIVINE Creation!
  • From: MTwain
• Understanding Relativity; was Re: to everyone
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: PD
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Can gravity become infinitely small?
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Obni
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• WYSIWYG in Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Mathematical Proof of God?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: An Infinite Universe?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: An Infinite Universe?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• An Infinite Universe?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Question about Life.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Question about Life.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Obni
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How fast is time? Light's clock
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Gravity probe B
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comic situation.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comic situation.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Comic situation.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Stress Energy Tensor -- covariance
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: to everyone
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quiz
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Meson Hoax
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity probe B
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Gravitons Speed and other Properties?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: to everyone
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: to everyone
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: to everyone
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: to everyone
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Gi Hold Retail Division
  • From: Goteborgbank
• Re: to everyone
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: PD
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• to everyone
  • From: tom_turcksin
• to everyone
  • From: tom_turcksin
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: why we need an unit standard for stupidity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why we need an unit standard for stupidity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Dono
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Obni
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Stress Energy Tensor -- covariance
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Stress Energy Tensor -- covariance
  • From: Norm
• Re: Uneven Acceleration of a Rigid body
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Dilaudid
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Chris
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's Headless Papal Guard.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Chris
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: why we need an unit standard for stupidity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Dilaudid
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why erlativity makes the center of milky way invisible?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Mret
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Mret
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Uneven Acceleration of a Rigid body
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Uneven Acceleration of a Rigid body
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Uneven Acceleration of a Rigid body
  • From: rAgAv
• UO plays key role in LIGO's new view of a cosmic event
  • From: shiv . nath . kk
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Chris
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why erlativity makes the center of milky way invisible?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR Mathematical help request
  • From: Eric Gisse
• GR Mathematical help request
  • From: curiosus_2008
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
  • From: xxein
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Manners
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Manners
  • From: PD
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Manners
  • From: Dono
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: bz
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity probe B
  • From: dlzc
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Mret
• World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: bz
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Manners
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Gravity probe B
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Manners
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: bryanjugglercryptographer
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: xxein
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Manners
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Manners
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Manners
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Manners
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: dlzc
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Enstein the World's Most Successful Science Fiction Writer
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Travelers L and R (a revised thought-experiment)
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: PD
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Dono
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: golfmyball
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: golfmyball
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativistic Center of Mass Shift
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: bryanjugglercryptographer
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Relativistic Center of Mass Shift
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: UTC
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Relativistic Center of Mass Shift
  • From: Zhaozhao
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: YBM
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic Center of Mass Shift
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: PD
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Quiz
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: bryanjugglercryptographer
• Relativistic Center of Mass Shift
  • From: Zhaozhao
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ballistic gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• ballistic gravitation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: bryanjugglercryptographer
• Re: wind chill
  • From: Androcles
• Re: wind chill
  • From: xxein
• wind chill
  • From: xxein
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Dono
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: xxein
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: xxein
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Standard Unit of Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: bryanjugglercryptographer
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Quiz
  • From: JanPB
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: Dono
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• anothe question: Do multiple speeds = multiple clocks?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Dono
• How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
  • From: Albertito
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Mret
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Alen
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Sue...
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: xxein
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: xxein