Re: ballistic gravitation


"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:d96d2627-842a-4426-98bd-45f72504f0f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 2, 5:15 am, "Thomas Heger" <hba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Sue...

I guess you misunderstood me. My idea is about a dynamic space. Its not the
picture of material objects floating through a vacuum. For me fields are a
property of space. Space is treated as a result not as a background.

I think, its a bit difficult to explain. When you look at i.e. an electron,
you can not distinguish the charge-field of the electron from the particle.
The relation is some kind of equivalence. This gives to me the idea, that in
large scales, you can treat space as if it is made of the contained bodies
and energetic fields. You leave out the distinction between matter, fields
and gravitation and treat the hole thing as if the space contained the
energetic content. Space in this picture is not empty background, its a
property of something unknown.

Space is build up by the distances between objects. Distances are related to
the em-field, since distance is defined as lightspeed x time. The reason for
timeflow and the constancy of c are in fact unknown, but you can treat it as
an axiom: a patch of space is moving constantly with c. The reason for this
view is the observer invariance of spacetime. Spacetime is not 'real' since
its made out of history. Obviously all objects share some points in
history. So you can treat their timeflow as relativ to spacetime, what makes
timeflow a movement in respect to spacetime. Timeflow is a specific property
of a local observer or in my picture a patch of space.

Space has no inertia, but you can treat it as if it had. You leave out the
relativ motion of the bodies an concentrate on the 'motion' of space.
Spacetime or my modell is the view on the aspect space. Its like a strange
optical instrument that you can turn in different directions - a bit like a
glassball. If you turn it you see something different. This is an analogy to
the direction of timeflow in respect to spacetime.

The use of this modell is: if you let space rotate, you can add up rotation.
There is no absolute reference. An object(in my modell a patch of space) has
neighbours in space and in time but no connection to the rest of the world.
It has his own history an is history to the future. If a time-vector is
deviated it will stay deviated and bending can add up cause there is no
force to turn warped spacetime back. You 'see' this adding up of rotation in
galaxy formation. Our sun feels at rest in our galaxy but we are circeling
around our galactic center. This is not made by gravitation of the center of
the galaxy but by the rotation of the hole spacetime in this region.

Thomas Heger


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ballistic gravitation
    ... picture of material objects floating through a vacuum. ... view is the observer invariance of spacetime. ... its made out of history. ... So you can treat their timeflow as relativ to spacetime, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
    ... is a fluid history, ... spacetime theory, it's a bit boring. ... degenerate to three spatial dimensions and we then adopt the general ... have no such completed system so I can only offer this as conjecture.Using a 4D map of events, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
    ... is a fluid history, ... spacetime theory, it's a bit boring. ... hopefully wipe away the distinction between electricity and magnetism ... degenerate to three spatial dimensions and we then adopt the general ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
    ... is a fluid history, ... spacetime theory, it's a bit boring. ... hopefully wipe away the distinction between electricity and magnetism ... degenerate to three spatial dimensions and we then adopt the general ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: K.E. and momentum
    ... Don't worry about Ken, in the big picture ... he's a flea! ... and how SpaceTime was born then, ... It's my sense we need to let the kids know ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)