Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:31:13 +1100
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b606eb29-b0e7-4fd1-b22d-2542160c0ed7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Photons are exitations of em-fields and therefor need an em-field
to propagate.
Photons don't propagate.
What makes you think they don't? What do you think they are? Perhaps you
think photons only exists as such when they are observed .. so the don't
actually propagate, they just appear?
http://nobelprize.org/physics/articles/ekspong/index.html
Nothing there about photons not propogating .. where did you see that
written in the link you quoted, hmm?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- References:
- ballistic gravitation
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: ballistic gravitation
- From: Sue...
- ballistic gravitation
- Prev by Date: Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?
- Next by Date: Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
- Previous by thread: Re: ballistic gravitation
- Next by thread: Re: ballistic gravitation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|