Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?

"Albertito" <albertito1992@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:294ea7db-3788-4153-9e74-5860fcc8de3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 3 ene, 11:58, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Albertito" <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:5faab68e-9789-4581-b2e1-8c4e8e5f2ea9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

fuckhead
http://www.upload-images.net/imagen/9f8acc8903.jpg
lock yourself in your domain of applicability,
sterile cum

I see you are not wanting to be taken seriously .. which is good, because
we
are all laughing at you

OK, Dr. Jeckyl (Mr. Hyde?). So, you want me to be taken seriously,
don't you?.

If you like

[snip]
The problem
with Einstein
SR is that it claims a particle with mass can be at rest.

Not really .. it says what happens if it were. And how to work out what
happens if it is not. Relativity gives us a model for what we should find
when we measure the universe .. and it seems towork very well.


.

Loading