Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- From: xxein@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:39:43 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 4, 9:37 am, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A time as the correct step. I was trying to derivie the formula for
gps mapping and the location was to be the place of the mobil gps
reciever. A person was to supply data. A geodetic reference frame
was to be the geography inferred.
Remember the assumed world geodetic geography is a convention data
set
while the derived formula was to allow this data set's inference.
Stanford has divulged the frame drag of geodetic as the cause to the
appearance of a force to precess a gryoscope. This force will also
cause time to alter, because the place of usage was the geodetic
frame
as the reference data set in the Stanford satillite usage. Meaning
the
same assumption of geodetic was used to infer the gyroscope frame
precession.
What I just said was the inverted relation of geodetic then allows
inference of the reversed relation between time and the location
where
time was measured. A timer was the standard gps clock. Nothing more.
A frame efffect of drag was not assigned to the geodetic relation by
Stanford, but it was implied to be caused by the shape of the well's
termination. Remember the gravity well is converging to the earth's
surface, not the well's of a point mass.
A set of wells was to be equated, just pretend we have to integrate
the applied gravity force from the center to the top of the spherical
earth. So the numericist in me says as an approximation just use to
Klein bottle like stepped spheres to calculate theforce of gravity
and
infer the time differences.
> >
> >
>
mass vertex
A shallow well denotes the top shpere element while the deep steep
well denotes the center earth elements of mass? Or is it the other
way
arround? Either way we can invert the effect as a numericist can,
while the mathematician can not.
When you do this to calculate, a geodetic relation occurs where the
element's geodetic was a simple well offset distance. Meaning the
inverse normalization of this Klein bottle element set has an linear
offset to cause shallow or deep well form assumed point element
masses.
This approximation as given appears to cause the frame, implying
geodetic as a formal drag itself. There is real professional debate
over this topic of classification of geodetic effect.
A shallow well is nothing more than the far off point source. A zero
offset element to confound was not allowed. I apply numericism. The
first test point is about ten miles thick, making the center the
offset. So calculate the mass of each element ond offset to the
realtive distance to the center of the earth.
Hint, they get larger in mass for equivalent thicknesses the higher
you go in a sphere.
So a theory of test was to cause the inverted Klein to calculate the
location on any Klein set of unknown thickness.
Making a single point inside the Klein a reference distance where the
surface was assumed the surface of the last exact sphere.
So the perfect flat geodetic altitude was to be the reference
distance. A mountian would be a new element, where the mass was
assumed a thin spherical pancake and not a lump.
S*time element= altitude at time element
time element is nothing more than a normal gps time signal to cause
location inference. S is the linear altitude fraction. A geodetic
uses the applied altitude to cause accurate location, here we invert
and infer a geodetic.
A value of altitude per unit time was stated in theory already. A
small approximation was one time element per .
So I have stated the use of geodetic time measure to measure an
inverse altitude map of the earth.
S= Sum(.......
A constant. A person must understand always relativity from this
example, altitude effect is indiscernable from relative satillite
distance time delay. An internal database allowed the assumption of
altitude at the element.
A numerical usage to element integrate a geodetic effect appears to
imply a distortion well effect. Making it only approximate General
Reltivity. Meaning the S per unit mass either changes with well
location distance up the well or not.
Is S/unit mass, a constant? If so we may truely nuerically
calculate. As opposed to the assumed numericist approximation.
A close examination of gps signal inference reveals the delay time as
independent of the General relative time effect.
time = relativity + distance propagation delay difference
So S is a variable ugh. This is how we get ot his point. A s as the
differential time was given by the time. A true reference time is
assumped for the location on the geodetic.
Here is the end game: (deleate invening doug speak)
s*dh= absolute time (gps clock corrected to measure GR effect only.)
where absolute time was the clock corrected to see general
relativity. A
singal calcualtion examiantion reveals the approximate solution to
geodectic as the method used in the gps. A non-geodetic location
calcualtes the time effect at the.....
So when a spherical earth was to be measured my method measures gps
altitude using a gps clock.
h=element offset.
It works it is already known I think, but it is close to leading edge
physics.
xxein: Welcome. Yes it is known. It is chartable and can be plugged
in as a deviation overlay, but too much trouble to be considered
completely calculable from any physics.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- References:
- World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- Prev by Date: Re: Tansverse mass
- Next by Date: Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
- Previous by thread: Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- Next by thread: Re: World Geodetic was Found Calculable using a Numercial Method
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
