Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:19:48 GMT
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:f5707397-af32-4fd6-80e3-6d76aee30588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 15, 2:18 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> Your calculation is wrong, Duck.
To the two-digit precision with which I did the calculation and stated
the results, the calculation is fine. And in fact, the correct
composition of velocities, taken to 2-digit precision, yields the same
results. This is more or less the same point that Dirk made to you.
Making a point to Androcles?
Um.
The only kind of point that could possibly make an impression
on Androcles, is The Icepick in The Forehead, but that's not
really my style. Though in Androcles' case...
Dirk Vdm
.
- References:
- Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: G
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: Dono
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: G
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: G
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: G
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: PD
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: Androcles
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: PD
- Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Prev by Date: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Next by Date: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Previous by thread: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Next by thread: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|