Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:22:48 +1100
"Dono" <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cd64b200-a745-46b5-bbee-99197853de05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
See my other post, it clarifies everything.
I think we're basically agreeing here, btw. One just does need to be
careful to avoid confusing the novices who genuinely come here in the hope
of better understanding SR, or of giving ammunition to the dishonest who
deliberately misrepresent what SR says and refuse to accept the physics, no
matter how clearly it is explained (although I really don't see why there
are people who are so religiously obsessed with finding faults in SR that
they are absolutely certain must be there .. I wonder if there is some
psychiatric terms for that condition .. other than "crackpot" :))
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Contraction Dilemma
- Next by Date: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Previous by thread: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Next by thread: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
