Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:30:12 GMT
<andrewgeorges93@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:22944222-fff6-47ed-a424-a30b1aa1f1e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 15, 10:43 pm, Koobee Wublee
This is nonsense. The Maxwell's equations work fine under the
Galilean transform.
Really? Apply them to the Maxwell wave equation. Show us what you
get.
Hmm... http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/maxeq.html
I get Faraday's law of induction and Gauss's law for magnetism.
Of course Maxwell was an aetherialist and the fake properties of aether
can be set to zero since Michelson got rid of aether...
What do you get?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- References:
- Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: G
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: PD
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: G
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: PD
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- From: andrewgeorges93
- Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Prev by Date: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Next by Date: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Previous by thread: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Next by thread: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Index(es):