Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito <albertito1992@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:06:27 -0800 (PST)
On 24 ene, 13:34, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 24, 8:04 am, Albertito <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The general expresion for composition of velocities is
a*b = sqrt((a^2 + b^2 + 2ab cos(alpha)) -
(ab sin(alpha))^2/c^2 ) /(1 + ab cos(alpha)/c^2),
where alpha is the angle between the velocities a and b.
If alpha=0, then the binary operator * reduces to
a*b = (a + b) /(1 + ab/c^2)
if alpha = pi/2, then
a*b = sqrt(a^2 + b^2 - (ab)^2/c^2)
if alpha = pi, then
a*b = (a - b) /(1 - ab/c^2)
Expressed more compactly:
(Galilean rule)
|a * b|^2 = |a + b|^2
(SR rule)
|a * b| = [ |a+b|^2 - |a x b|^2 ] / [1 - |a.b|/c^2]^2
Since the operator * is defined as a function of alpha, we see it is
not unique.
What do you mean it's not unique? alpha is fixed
for any vectors a and b, as is the sum a+b,
the cross product a x b and the dot product
a.b.
"Not unique" would imply that you could have different
values for a given a and b.
Wrong again, as usual.
- Randy
I mean by 'not unique' that the law of parallelogram for addition
of velocities in SR would be only valid to a first aproximation.
If a and b are two vectors, then the norm of its sum vector is
|a+b| = sqrt(|a|^2 + |b|^2 + 2|a| |b| cos(alpha)).
So, if the norm of its relativistic composition is
|a*b| = sqrt(( |a|^2 + |a|^2 + 2 |a||b| cos(alpha)) -
( |a||b| sin(alpha))^2/c^2 ) /(1 + |a||b| cos(alpha)/c^2),
We have
|a*b|^2 = (|a+b|^2 - B)/A,
where
A = (1 + |a| |b| cos(alpha)/c^2)^2 , and
B = ( |a| |b| sin(alpha)/c)^2.
SR deforms the law of paralleogram.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- References:
- Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Randy Poe
- Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Prev by Date: Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
- Next by Date: Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
- Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Index(es):