Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Randy Poe <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:29:57 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 24, 10:25 am, Albertito <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24 ene, 14:17, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1f4e6459-472a-44bc-99c2-f7065a5b4027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
So by "not unique" you mean "unique, but not Galilean."
Is that supposed to be news? I agree, SR velocity
composition is not Galilean.
Gee.... what *is* the matter with this kid???
Dirk Vdm
So, you want to know what's the 'matter with this kid'.
It happens that I'm not a kid, I'm already 16.
Ah. Dirk's hypothesis was correct.
Bad news: 16 is a kid.
It happens
that I'm trying to think for myself, not like you, believer,
Your "independent thought" involves using things
other than logical deduction. Yes, it's true
that we shy away from illogic. And it's true that
I am a "believer" that the rules of logical
deduction are valid.
that only can think by means of the sacred gods of physics.
That's the reason why I may do a lot of mistakes. I can learn
from my mistakes. Can you learn from the mistakes sacred
gods of physics may do?. No, that's impossible, if a sacred god
makes a mistake, you still believe him, you still think there is no
mistake at all. That's the matter with you, believer!!!!!!!!!!!.
The usual uneducated nonsense. But in your favor is
the fact that you sound like a kid and you are
a kid. I'm not sure what to say about the
70-year-olds who also sound like they've never
had an education.
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- References:
- Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- From: Albertito
- Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Prev by Date: Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Next by Date: Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity fails a simple algebraic test
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|