Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:10:43 +1100
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message news:fnpp4f$vq9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13q0pdcdqvf739a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"snapdragon31" <snapdragon31@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:185c9dbf-f01c-4681-b266-a9bf152d5c92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
4. x' = x * sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
5. t' = t * sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
Lets just double check that .. LT tells us that (assuming we have that at
t=t'=0 x=x'=0, the corresponding event for (x,t) for S is (x',t') for M,
where
x' = gamma(x - vt)
t' = gamma(t - xv/c^2)
where gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
So when M (as seen from S) has gone a distance x = vt, M will be at
(x1',t1') in its own frame of reference
x1' = gamma(vt - vt)
x1' = 0 (as expected .. M has not moved relative to itself)
t1' = gamma(t - vtv/c^2)
t1' = gamma(t(1 - v^2/c^2))
t1' = gamma(t(1 - v^2/c^2))
t1' = t/gamma
and at that time, M will see S as being at (x2',t2')
x2' = -vt1'
x2' = -vt/gamma
x2' = -x/gamma
So that's all fine (other than getting the sign correct there)
All fine?
Yes all fine, provided x' = t' = x = t = 0
No .. all fine for all values where x = vt (ie for all spacetime events
along the path of M). Lorentz transforms do work for values other than 0
you know !! :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- References:
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Prev by Date: Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard
- Next by Date: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Previous by thread: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Next by thread: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|