Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:41:24 -0800
In sci.physics.relativity, Randy Poe
<poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:42:33 -0800 (PST)
<bbd2c968-10a2-4310-8cb5-9edac2e950cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Jan 30, 11:27 am, "Ockham" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ew...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:l2d675-gfp.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Jeckyl
| <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:28:28 +1100
| <13q0kaft9d71...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > "Ockham" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >news:SAXnj.14454$3m6.7071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >>
| >> "snapdragon31" <snapdrago...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >>news:dc482e20-b4df-43ff-a84e-70909a0b93b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> On Jan 29, 8:54 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >>> On Jan 29, 8:14 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
| >>>
| >>> > According to relativists, GPS clocks GAIN 38us per day on the ground
| >>> > clock.
| >>> > That is due to two components, 45us for gravity and -7us for
relative
| >>> > speed.
| >>>
| >>> > Accordingly, an observer (OO) in GPS orbit would see the GC LOSING
52us
| >>> > per
| >>> > day.
| >>>
| >>> > After one year, the OO would calculate that the OC was about 19ms
ahead
| >>> > of the
| >>> > GC.
| >>> > However, the GO would calculate that his GC was only 13ms behind.
| >>>
| >>> > What happens when the clocks are reunited?
| >>> > Who is right?
| >>>
| >>> Two people drive different routes from city A to
| >>> city B. When they are reunited, one odometer reads
| >>> 220 km and the other reads 230 km. Which one is
| >>> right?
| >>>
| >>> - Randy
| >>
| >> | According to relativity, both odometer readings are wrong. They do
| >> | not represent the true distance of the routes travelled because of
the
| >> | length contraction effect.
| >> | According to Newton's law, both odometer readings are right.
| >>
| >> | The GPS clock paradox is a variation of the twin paradox, so no valid
| >> | solution.
| >>
| >> The paradox resides in the third postulate.
| >
| > Androcles .. we've told you .. there is no third postulate
|
| Yes there is; it's not usually expressed as a postulate, but
| it is a simple one:
|
| - If a TWLS be conducted between a source and a moving mirror,
| then the time taken (as observed by the source) of the
| light beam from source to mirror and back to source is
| exactly twice that of the time taken from source to
| mirror. In other words, t_AB = t_BA.
Not true, the reflected beam will be doppler shifted.
Yes, both wavelength and frequency experience a doppler shift.
Only in SR (though both have been observed). In Newtonian
math the frequency changes as per the Doppler, but the
wavelength is unaltered.
That's how doppler radar works.
Since c1 = lamba1 * f outbound and c2 = lambda2 * f inbound
it follows that c1 <> c2.
How does that follow without a statement about
how both lambda and f shift?
As it turns out, if lambda2 = p*lambda1, then
f inbound = f outbound/p. As a result,
lambda2 * f_inbound = (lambda1*p)*(f_outbound/p)
= lambda1 * f_outbound.
- Randy
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Now in nine exciting editions. Try them all!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Ockham
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- References:
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Ockham
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Ockham
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Prev by Date: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Next by Date: Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?
- Previous by thread: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Next by thread: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|