Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"

On Jan 31, 2:18 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 9:00 pm, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Vres,

I agree about these problems, even John S Bell, did have problems to
persuade his colleges about his ideas. about some sort of a refrence
frame and real Fitgerald contraction.
In my own search for reference effects I found several experiments but
mostly far away from the Earth, because the earth seem so mimic
relativity rules by a complex Higgs oscillating vacuum lattice.

For John Bell see:

How, John S. Bell preferred to teach special relativity.
See also:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-
could-influence.html

This is a clear example of how mainstream physics differ from logic
relativity thinking.
According to mainstream physics the thin thread between the rockets
will not break because the thread with the two rockets will not change
length measured by their own rulers!!

Quotation of John S. Bell; See; J.S.Bell's book "Speakable and
unspeakable in quantum mechanics."( paperback page 67, how to teach
special relativity)

"I have for long thought that if I had the opportunity to teach this
subject, I would emphasize the continuity with earlier ideas.
Usually it is the discontinuity which is stressed, the radical break
with more primitive notions of space and time. Often the result is
to destroy completely the confidence of the student in perfectly
sound and useful concepts already acquired'.
If you doubt this, then you might try the experiment of confronting
your students with the following situation. Three small spaceships,
A, B, and C, drift freely in a region of space remote from other
matter, without rotation and without relative motion, with B and C
equidistant from A.
On reception of a signal from A the motors of B and C are ignited
and they accelerate gently'.
Let ships B and C be identical, and have identical acceleration
programmes. Then (as reckoned by an observer in A) they will have at
every moment the same velocity, and so remain displaced one from the
other by a fixed distance. Suppose that a .fragile thread is tied
initially between projections from B and C. If it is just
long enough to span the required distance initially, then as the
rockets speed up, it will become too short, because of its need to
Fitzgerald contract, and must finally break, It must break when, at
a sufficiently high velocity, the artificial prevention of the
natural contraction imposes intolerable stress."
I think Bell is right in his logic, also and in addition because the
rockets itself
will contract in length, which makes the mutual distance for the
thread longer to span.

Leo Vuyk.

[Reply]

.

On Jan 30, 5:03 pm, "Vres" <v...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

"How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"

     The previous posting showed ("A Basic Look at the Aether") that the
classical Aether must exist because it endowed the volume of supposedly
"empty" space with observable properties. If space were not filled with
"something" it could not have any properties other than volume since "space"
is an abstract mathematical concept, it is not "real". If, however, we add
the concept of the Aether, the confusion associated with the Relativity
concepts vanishes.

     Starting with Newtonian physics, let us add the observationally proven
concept that light propagates through space (i.e.- the Aether) at a velocity
determined by the permeability and dielectric constant of space. Light, and
all electromagnetic radiation, is a transverse wave and as such cannot
propagate through a fluid. It was concluded Early on that the Aether must be
a solid. If we examine the propagation of light though the cosmos we observe
that there is no detectable chromatic dispersion. The lack of such
dispersion shows that the Aether is either a continuous solid (like jello)
or granular (like tapioca). To produce the observed lack of chromatic
dispersion, the maximum  possible size of granularity must be extremely
small even compared to the Planck Length (10^35 meters). In addition, to
produce the cosmologically observed gravitational and inertial effects, the
Aether must be extremely ridged. Since matter can move freely though the
Aether, matter cannot be a solid, but rather must be composed of standing
waves, as some current theories have suggested. (If, for example, a quark or
an electron consisted of a single cycle of electromagnetic radiation
refracted into a circular path, a charged particle would be produced which
could propagate through the solid Aether -http://einsteinhoax.com/posting44.htm. and be observed as matter.

     A basic premise of the Relativity concepts is that the velocity of
light is the same IN all velocity and elevation reference frames. This idea
has falsely been interpreted to means that the velocity of light is the same
BETWEEN all reference frames. Once one recognizes the difference, the
mystery of Relativity vanishes and the subject is easily understood at the
intuitive level. This basic premise of Relativity is incorrectly stated, it
should read that matter controls its properties by measuring the LOCAL
velocity of light and adjusting them so as to make the LOCALLY observed
velocity of light as C. There is no requirement that the velocity of light
be equal to C in other reference frames.

     With this in mind, consider that the observer's reference frame is at
absolute rest (an arbitrary but legitimate choice). In a reference frame
which is moving with respect to the observer's frame, light has further to
travel to make a round trip. In the direction parallel to the velocity
vector, the travel distance is increased by 1/(1-V^2/C^2) and in the
transverse direction by (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. In order for the velocity of
light to be C, as observed in the moving reference frame, matter must
contract in the direction of the velocity vector in proportion to
(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. and the duration of the ticks of a clock must become longer
in proportion to (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. (This conclusion was provided by
Fitzgerald and Larmor two years prior to the publication of Special
Relativity.) This conclusion makes all of the effects associated with
Special Relativity intuitively obvious if one is not too lazy to think them
true (only algebra is required).  It can be shown that when velocity is
increased, additional energy is added to any energy in the matter. It is
this storage of energy which we observe as kinetic energy. It is associated
with the so-called "fictitious" force of inertia and results from a REAL
push against the Aether.

     There is, in addition, a relativistic effect associated with the
proximity of energy. The proximity of energy causes the local permeability
of space to be reduced. This reduction in permeability reduces the ABSOLUTE
velocity of light and causes matter to contract. In this contraction, matter
sheds energy by releasing the energy of fall and, after the fall contains a
mass energy which, in absolute terms, has been reduced by that energy. The
effect is to cause matter to "push" against the Aether with a force which is
currently (and falsely) interpreted as the "fictitious" force of gravity.

     All of the relativistic effects (velocity and gravity) can be defined
by three sets of transformations (transformations for other terms are found
by applying Dimensional Analysis to accepted physical laws).

Force =   1
Length =   (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5)/(1-$)
Time =  ((1-V^2/C^2)^0.5)*(1-$)

Where $ is the gravitational potential between elevations as measured in
terms of the upper elevation units of measurement. It was very satisfying to
find that these transformations lead to predictions of the cosmologically
observed universe.

     The source material for this posting may be found inhttp://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm(1997);http://einsteinhoax.com/gravit...
(1987); andhttp://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm(1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

     All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at thehttp://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

     Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

     E-mail:- einsteinh...@xxxxxxxx If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

     The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

fragile related to this subject:

The need for a new black hole theory.
Pairing black holes.
Gas/ dust pillar regions like the Carina nebula, seem to be cradles of
stars and in addition, cradles for fast multiplying supernova black
holes.
These newly formed black holes have a peculiar habit, they tend to
pair in groups and form Herbig Haro objects, the start of an open star
cluster in between these paired black holes.
See:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

Not only at this scale we can find such dumbbell structures but all
over the cosmos, from HH objects to Galaxy clusters. See Coma cluster
by Chandra image.http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2002/0150/index.html
Conclusion, we need a new scenario for black holes, because they seem
to repel Fermions and leave gas channels behind as in the Carina
nebula.

Leo Vuyk.

A possible evidence for the new stellar black hole model predicting
two Solar polar black holes at long distance, described before,

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
should have be found by the MACHO (Massive astrophysical compact halo
object) project team, cause by the expected gravitational lensing
effects around the paired Solar polar located black holes.
I was highly pleased and amused to find a clear indication of at
least one anomalous MACHO lensing effect located at l-b= 3.11-3.01!

MACHO survey based evidence for at least one of the two Stellar Anchor
Black Holes (SABH) of our Sun, located at (l-b) = (3.11-3.01)
degrees, by the anomalous high MACHO field 104 see:

Microlensing Optical Depth towards the Galactic Bulge Using Clump
Giants from the MACHO Survey. P. Popowski1, K. Griest2, et all.

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-10824.pdf
Short quotation of the tam on field 104:

“Finally, we discuss the possibility of anomalous duration
distribution of events in the field 104 centred on (l, b) =
(3.◦11,−3.◦01)

Using 7 years of MACHO survey data, we present a new determination of
the optical depth to microlensing towards the Galactic bulge. We
select the sample of 62 microlensing events (60 unique) on clump giant
sources and perform a detailed efficiency analysis.
6. Clustering of Events and Concentration of Long Events in Field
104. The optical depth for field 104 is larger than any other field
and we would like to investigate whether this is a statistical
fluctuation or an indication of something unusual about this region of
the Galaxy. The large optical depth is related to the fact that 9 of
the 62 clump giant events are in field 104, and because there is also
a high concentration of long-duration events in this field. Four out
of the 10 events longer than ˆt = 100 days are in field 104, including
the 2 of the 3 longest.”

Leo Vuyk
.