sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• finally high resolution images from moon, inocs
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Eef
• About Nimtz superluminal, Josef Matz
  • Re: About Nimtz superluminal, Dono
    • Re: About Nimtz superluminal, Josef Matz
      • Re: About Nimtz superluminal, Dono
  • Re: About Nimtz superluminal, Tom Roberts
• Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0, Sue...
• Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?, Artful
  • Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?, kenseto
  • Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?, Dono
  • Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?, Dono
  • Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?, Martin Hogbin
• space, Thomas Heger
  • Re: space, Bill Hobba
• Is the extrinsic curvature of a curve related to its 4-acceleration?, babaluyee
  • Re: Is the extrinsic curvature of a curve related to its 4-acceleration?, babaluyee
• what is the speed of gravity geometry?, diego
  • Re: what is the speed of gravity geometry?, xxein
• if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?, diego
  • Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?, Dono
  • Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?, babaluyee
    • Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?, Thomas Heger
  • Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?, Igor
• how small a black hole can be?, diego
• The anomaly terminator, Albertito
  • Re: The anomaly terminator, Dono
  • Re: The anomaly terminator, Eric Gisse
    • Re: The anomaly terminator, Albertito
      • Re: The anomaly terminator, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The anomaly terminator, Albertito
      • Re: The anomaly terminator, Dono
      • Re: The anomaly terminator, Albertito
      • Re: The anomaly terminator, Dono
• Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS, Eric Gisse
• Re: Multi Level Marketing - Mutual Pension Plan - Teambuilding and Internet Marketing, Don Stockbauer
• Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Need opinions for theory., lithium
  • Re: Need opinions for theory., Sue...
    • Re: Need opinions for theory., Ragnar
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Need opinions for theory., bz
    • Re: Need opinions for theory., lithium
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., bz
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., lithium
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., lithium
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., lithium
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., bz
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., lithium
      • Re: Need opinions for theory., lithium
  • Re: Need opinions for theory., Dono
• Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation, Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Worldwide Home Workers Needed., Martin Hogbin
• The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, bkh99
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, shalayka
    • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, xxein
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Androcles
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, shalayka
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Androcles
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Albertito
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Androcles
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Albertito
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Artful
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Albertito
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Artful
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Androcles
• the theory of close loop wormholed universe, tantal
  • Re: the theory of close loop wormholed universe, tantal
    • Re: the theory of close loop wormholed universe, xxein
      • Re: the theory of close loop wormholed universe, Androcles
      • Re: the theory of close loop wormholed universe, tantal
• "Retic Postings and SPAM", Eef
• Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
  • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Androcles
    • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Androcles
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, PD
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, PD
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Androcles
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Androcles
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Sue...
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Sue...
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Sue...
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Artful
  • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, PD
    • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Albertito
      • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, PD
    • Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat, Androcles
• "Physics Forums", pmb
  • Re: "Physics Forums", Androcles
  • Re: "Physics Forums", Johnnie In The Billows
• Kaluza-Klein Theory and Lorentz Force Geodesics . . . And the Maxwell Tensor PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
• is an wormhole an oneway wormhole?, tantal
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Eef
• Eric Gisse force people not to read, while he read, tantal
  • Re: Eric Gisse force people not to read, while he read, tantal
  • Re: Eric Gisse force people not to read, while he read, Igor
• How are photons mirrored?, Rudolf Drabek
  • Re: How are photons mirrored?, dlzc
    • Re: How are photons mirrored?, tantal
    • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: How are photons mirrored?, dlzc
  • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Sue...
  • Re: How are photons mirrored?, tantal
  • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Sue...
    • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: How are photons mirrored?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: How are photons mirrored?, Sue...
• Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Albertito
  • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Dono
    • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Lady Chacha
  • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, PD
    • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, PD
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Simple Simon
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, PD
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, PD
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, PD
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, PD
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Dono
      • Re: Twin paradox with jam spread on a pancake, Lady Chacha
• The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
  • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
    • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Androcles
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
  • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Androcles
  • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Eric Gisse
    • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
  • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
    • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Androcles
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Androcles
    • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Sue...
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Sue...
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Sue...
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Artful
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Alen
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Sue...
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, Sue...
      • Re: The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime, PD
• The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Albertito
  • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Artful
    • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Albertito
  • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Dono
    • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Lady Chacha
  • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Bill Hobba
    • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Albertito
      • Re: The origin of gravity is the Awareness of God, Igor
• A cost effective deflector shield for interstellar travel?, Jimmy
  • Re: A cost effective deflector shield for interstellar travel?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "A Snapshot of a Photon", Yap
• Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA, Dono
• Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, kenseto
    • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, kenseto
      • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, Artful
      • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, kenseto
• Kepler's Third Law, Yuancur
  • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Dono
    • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Yuancur
    • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Lady Chacha
  • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Yuancur
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Dono
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Lady Chacha
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Yuancur
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Dono
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Yuancur
      • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Lady Chacha
  • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Koobee Wublee
  • Re: Kepler's Third Law, Ken S. Tucker
• how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, caliber
  • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, caliber
      • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, caliber
      • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, xxein
      • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, Androcles
      • Re: how do i know where to land from a wormhole?, tantal
• excuse my french, why are relativists not contradicting anymore, caliber
• what on earth is an assistant profesor?, caliber
  • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Randy Poe
    • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, caliber
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Randy Poe
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, caliber
    • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Androcles
    • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, caliber
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, Lady Chacha
      • Re: what on earth is an assistant profesor?, tantal
• why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
  • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
    • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, caliber
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Bryan Olson
    • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Lady Chacha
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, tantal
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why no satellite close pictures of moon landing bases?, Koobee Wublee
• why even god need to obey relativity?, caliber
• History of relativity, Juan R.
  • Re: History of relativity, Dono
    • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
  • Re: History of relativity, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: History of relativity, Artful
      • Re: History of relativity, Androcles
      • Re: History of relativity, Artful
      • Re: History of relativity, Artful
      • Re: History of relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, PD
      • Re: History of relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: History of relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: History of relativity, PD
      • Re: History of relativity, maxwell
      • Re: History of relativity, Eric Gisse
    • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: History of relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: History of relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
  • Re: History of relativity, harry
    • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
  • Re: History of relativity, Tom Roberts
    • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
    • Re: History of relativity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: History of relativity, PD
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, PD
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: History of relativity, maxwell
    • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
    • Re: History of relativity, harry
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, harry
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, harry
      • Re: History of relativity, Androcles
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
      • Re: History of relativity, harry
      • Re: History of relativity, Juan R.
  • Re: History of relativity, Dono
    • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
      • Re: History of relativity, Dono
      • Re: History of relativity, Lady Chacha
• Astronomers discover largest-ever dark matter structures spanning 270M light-years, steve . butler . 33
• college/universities, dkjunglebeat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, ▐█▬█▐▄█▐▀█▀█▐▌█▄
  • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, xxein
  • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, Artful
    • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, caliber
      • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, xxein
      • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, tantal
      • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, xxein
      • Re: why in order to understand relativity you need to really want to understand relativity?, Androcles
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Yap
  • Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Dono
    • Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Karandash
  • <spam>, JanPB
    • Re: <spam>, xxein
      • Re: <spam>, JanPB
• Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Androcles
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Sue...
    • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Juan R.
    • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Dono
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Karandash
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Dono
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Karandash
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Yuancur
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Yuancur
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Yuancur
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Juan R.
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Dono
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Lady Chacha
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Juan R.
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Juan R.
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Dono
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Lady Chacha
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, xxein
    • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT, Daryl McCullough
• Final Proof of G-relativity., Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Final Proof of G-relativity., xxein
• why relativity makes people unable to learn?, ▄█▐▄█ ▄█▀ ▀█▀ █ █▀█
• What is Proper Time?, kenseto
  • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
    • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, G. L. Bradford
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
  • Re: What is Proper Time?, Bryan Olson
  • Re: What is Proper Time?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: What is Proper Time?, Karandash
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Lady Chacha
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Dono
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Lady Chacha
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Dono
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Lady Chacha
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Dono
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Lady Chacha
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Lady Chacha
  • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
    • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Androcles
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Sue...
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Androcles
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Androcles
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, YBM
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is Proper Time?, Igor
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Yap
• COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, andrewmarcopaul
  • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Karandash
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Lady Chacha
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Lady Chacha
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Dono
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Juan R.
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Karandash
    • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, dlzc
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Eric Gisse
      • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, dlzc
• Quantum Geometry, Q_Gravity
  • Re: Quantum Geometry, Androcles
• what relativity domain of application, where is it?, torque
• Re: Pound Rebka, John C . Polasek
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Yap
  • Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Josef Matz
    • Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Androcles
• Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.", John Kennaugh
  • Re: Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea.", oriel36
• Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Johnnie In The Billows
  • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Johnnie In The Billows
  • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, PD
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Johnnie In The Billows
      • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, ▄█▐▄█ ▄█▀ ▀█▀ █ █▀█
  • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, kk
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Uncool Al
      • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, kk
      • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Thomas Heger
  • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Johnnie In The Billows
  • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Thomas Heger
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Johnnie In The Billows
      • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Thomas Heger
  • Message not available
    • Re: Only An Idiot Would Post On This Group, Johnnie In The Billows
• Causal decoupling, Realo
  • Re: Causal decoupling, xxein
    • Re: Causal decoupling, Androcles
• Project Gemini Model, aircraftsmodel@xxxxxxxxx
• Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, torque
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Androcles
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Androcles
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Androcles
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Dono
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Karandash
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Dono
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Lady Chacha
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Yuancur
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton, Yuancur
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of, Matthew Johnson
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of, Koobee Wublee
• is gravity electrostatic?, torque
  • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, Randy Poe
    • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, torque
      • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, Randy Poe
      • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, torque
  • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, Johnnie In The Billows
  • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, Igor
    • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, torque
      • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, Igor
      • Re: is gravity electrostatic?, dove
• "The Einstein Hoax", Yap
• Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
  • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
    • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, torque
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, dlzc
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Lady Chacha
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Yuancur
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Yuancur
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Dono
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Lady Chacha
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, dlzc
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Karandash
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Androcles
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Jerry
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Albertito
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Albertito
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Jerry
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Jerry
      • Re: Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts, Juan R.
• frankly, physics without tensors??, torque
  • Re: frankly, physics without tensors??, xxein
  • Re: frankly, physics without tensors??, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: frankly, physics without tensors??, dove
• how could Einstein get such a good paid job at a patent office?, torque
  • Re: how could Einstein get such a good paid job at a patent office?, maxwell
  • Re: how could Einstein get such a good paid job at a patent office?, Randy Poe
    • Re: how could Einstein get such a good paid job at a patent office?, torque
• was Einstein a mechanical or an electronic engineer?, torque
• let me put it simple, no phd no real physics, torque
  • Re: let me put it simple, no phd no real physics, xxein
    • Re: let me put it simple, no phd no real physics, dove
      • Re: let me put it simple, no phd no real physics, xxein
• where is relativity symmetric?, torque
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Yap
  • Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", kenseto
• Poincare's relativity papers, d_hainz
  • Re: Poincare's relativity papers, blackhead
    • Re: Poincare's relativity papers, d_hainz
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Nemy
• why in relativity acceleration and gravity are suposely the same?, █▐▄▐▄▐▄▌█▀█▀█▐▐▬▌
  • Re: why in relativity acceleration and gravity are suposely the same?, Johnnie In The Billows
• SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Sue...
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, wugi
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, wugi
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, wugi
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Simple Simon
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Simple Simon
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Simple Simon
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Lady Chacha
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Tom Roberts
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), PD
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Bryan Olson
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Artful
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Bryan Olson
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Simple Simon
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), Dono
      • Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction), kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, dlzc
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, bz
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, bz
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, bz
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Dono
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, harry
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Eric Gisse
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Tom Roberts
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Eric Gisse
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, kenseto
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Randy Poe
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Randy Poe
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Randy Poe
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
    • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Artful
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, PD
      • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction, Androcles
• An SR question, Dono
  • Re: An SR question, Eric Gisse
    • Re: An SR question, Dono
    • Re: An SR question, Dono
  • Re: An SR question, Surfer
    • Re: An SR question, Dono
  • Re: An SR question, Karandash
    • Re: An SR question, Dono
      • Re: An SR question, Karandash
      • Re: An SR question, Dono
      • Re: An SR question, Karandash
• can relativists explain this anti gravity proof here?, ▐♥▌€ ▐▬▌۝▐▄▐∕▌
  • Re: can relativists explain this anti gravity proof here?, Dono
    • Re: can relativists explain this anti gravity proof here?, █▐▄▐▄▐▄▌█▀█▀█▐▐▬▌
    • Re: can relativists explain this anti gravity proof here?, Karandash
• why relativists just can't handle the truth?, ▐♥▌♂♫☼☻▐♥▌
• Unification of the general theory of the relativity and of the quantum mechanics, Q_Gravity
  • Re: Unification of the general theory of the relativity and of the quantum mechanics, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Nemy
  • Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Nemy
• PRIVATE PHYSICS, karamihas
  • Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS, Androcles
  • Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS, Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • PRIVATE PHYSICS, karamihas
    • Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS, Dono
      • Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS, Lady Chacha
• Question about 5-D Kaluza Klein Theories with a Timelike rather than Spacelike Extra Dimension, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Question about 5-D Kaluza Klein Theories with a Timelike rather than Spacelike Extra Dimension, dlzc
    • Re: Question about 5-D Kaluza Klein Theories with a Timelike rather than Spacelike Extra Dimension, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Question about 5-D Kaluza Klein Theories with a Timelike rather than Spacelike Extra Dimension, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Question about 5-D Kaluza Klein Theories with a Timelike rather than Spacelike Extra Dimension, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Question about 5-D Kaluza Klein Theories with a Timelike rather than Spacelike Extra Dimension, Dave Snead
• Re: Apollo lunar landscapes and stars, sal
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Apollo lunar landscapes and stars, Androcles
• I don't get it, pete . hague
  • Re: I don't get it, Randy Poe
    • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: I don't get it, kenseto
      • Re: I don't get it, PD
      • Re: I don't get it, kenseto
  • Re: I don't get it, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
  • Re: I don't get it, PD
    • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: I don't get it, PD
      • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: I don't get it, PD
      • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: I don't get it, PD
      • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: I don't get it, OG
      • Re: I don't get it, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
    • Re: I don't get it, lithium
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, lithium
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, lithium
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
  • Re: I don't get it, JanPB
  • Re: I don't get it, kk
    • Re: I don't get it, JanPB
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, JanPB
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, kk
      • Re: I don't get it, JanPB
      • Re: I don't get it, kk
      • Re: I don't get it, harry
    • Re: I don't get it, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: I don't get it, Tom Roberts
    • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
  • Re: I don't get it, wugi
    • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
  • Re: I don't get it, dlzc
  • Re: I don't get it, kenseto
  • Re: I don't get it, luke . saul
    • Re: I don't get it, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: I don't get it, luke . saul
    • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, luke . saul
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
  • Re: I don't get it, oriel36
  • Re: I don't get it, Alen
    • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
    • Re: I don't get it, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: I don't get it, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: I don't get it, pete . hague
      • Re: I don't get it, kk
      • Re: I don't get it, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: I don't get it, kk
      • Re: I don't get it, JanPB
      • Re: I don't get it, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: I don't get it, kenseto
      • Re: I don't get it, kk
      • Re: I don't get it, Bryan Olson
      • Re: I don't get it, kk
      • Re: I don't get it, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Re: I don't get it, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: I don't get it, latente
      • Re: I don't get it, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: I don't get it, harry
  • Re: I don't get it, John Kennaugh
    • Re: I don't get it, Tom Roberts
      • Re: I don't get it, Androcles
      • Re: I don't get it, Artful
      • Re: I don't get it, John Kennaugh
      • Re: I don't get it, Artful
      • Re: I don't get it, maxwell
      • Re: I don't get it, Tom Roberts
      • Re: I don't get it, maxwell
      • Re: I don't get it, John Kennaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: I don't get it, Artful
      • Message not available
      • Re: I don't get it, Artful
      • Re: I don't get it, harry
      • Re: I don't get it, oriel36
  • Re: I don't get it, Sue...
    • Re: I don't get it, Sue...
• experiments and relativity principle, David
  • Re: experiments and relativity principle, Sue...
  • Re: experiments and relativity principle, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: experiments and relativity principle, David
      • Re: experiments and relativity principle, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: experiments and relativity principle, Tom Roberts
• An overly weird curved spacetime, Albertito
  • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Albertito
    • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Igor
    • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, PD
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Androcles
    • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, JanPB
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Tom Roberts
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Igor
      • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, JanPB
  • Re: An overly weird curved spacetime, Sue...
• Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
  • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Androcles
    • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Androcles
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Dono
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Androcles
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Androcles
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Jerry
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, harry
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, harry
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Androcles
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Androcles
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Edward Green
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, JanPB
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, maxwell
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, maxwell
      • Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
  • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
    • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, sal
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Juan R.
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Dono
  • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, maxwell
    • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, Edward Green
  • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
    • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, maxwell
      • Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz, d_hainz
• Summary of The Unified Field Theory, bkh99
  • Re: Summary of The Unified Field Theory, Androcles
  • Re: Summary of The Unified Field Theory, xxein
    • Re: Summary of The Unified Field Theory, Androcles
  • Re: Summary of The Unified Field Theory, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Summary of The Unified Field Theory, Bill Hobba
• Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Randy Poe
    • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Randy Poe
    • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Sue...
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Randy Poe
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Randy Poe
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, JanPB
  • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, PD
    • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, Androcles
    • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, rbaulbin
      • Re: Semantics of Special Relativity, PD
• "The Nature of Mass", Nemy
• quantum gravity, Thomas Heger
• particles, Thomas Heger
  • Re: particles, Thomas Heger
• Spin, Thomas Heger
  • Re: Spin, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Spin, Albertito
      • Re: Spin, JanPB
      • Re: Spin, Albertito
      • Re: Spin, PD
    • Re: Spin, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Spin, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Spin, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Spin, Thomas Heger
• Cc, Grant M. W.
• A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
  • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Androcles
    • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
  • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Sue...
  • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Androcles
    • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Jerry
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Igor
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, sal
  • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?, Alen
• Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, xxein
  • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, Androcles
  • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, PD
    • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, muller
    • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, xxein
      • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, PD
      • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, JanPB
    • Message not available
      • Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma, Eric Gisse
• Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, Eric Gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, Eric Gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, Thomas Heger
      • Message not available
      • Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, Thomas Heger
      • Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, muller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why was Einstein nobelized for his photo-electric system?, Juan R.
• variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, babaluyee
  • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Tom Roberts
    • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, babaluyee
      • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Tom Roberts
      • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, babaluyee
    • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Eric Gisse
      • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Tom Roberts
      • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Eric Gisse
  • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Eric Gisse
      • Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric, Ken S. Tucker
• Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Albertito
  • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Randy Poe
    • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Albertito
    • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Androcles
  • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Androcles
  • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Dono
  • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Albertito
      • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Dono
      • Re: Which ones of these assertions by Stefan Marinov are true?, Tom Roberts
• Gravity observations question, David
  • Re: Gravity observations question, Sue...
  • Re: Gravity observations question, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Gravity observations question, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Gravity observations question, David
  • Re: Gravity observations question, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Gravity observations question, David
      • Re: Gravity observations question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gravity observations question, Androcles
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Nemy
• Question on GR sources, Edward Green
  • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Sue...
      • Re: Question on GR sources, xxein
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Androcles
      • Re: Question on GR sources, lithium
      • Re: Question on GR sources, xxein
      • Re: Question on GR sources, lithium
  • Re: Question on GR sources, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Question on GR sources, PD
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, PD
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Question on GR sources, JanPB
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, JanPB
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, JanPB
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, PD
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, JanPB
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, JanPB
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Question on GR sources, xxein
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Question on GR sources, xxein
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Edward Green
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Question on GR sources, Eric Gisse
• If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Albertito
  • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Dono
    • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Albertito
    • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Juan R.
    • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Karandash
  • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Dono
    • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Karandash
  • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, dlzc
    • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Albertito
      • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Albertito
      • Re: If you do not believe in God, why do you study theology?, Daryl McCullough
• What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
  • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Albertito
  • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
    • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Albertito
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Albertito
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Albertito
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Albertito
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
      • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Juan R.
  • Re: What is the velocity of a relativistic electron?, Dono
• Space Shuttle Orbiter Collection on Sale, aircraftsmodel@xxxxxxxxx
• the smallest, Grant M. W.
• Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Pentcho Valev
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Ian Noble
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, harry
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Androcles
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Dono
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Karandash
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Androcles
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, kenseto
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, kenseto
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, kenseto
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Bryan Olson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, harry
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Androcles
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Androcles
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Androcles
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Androcles
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Rudolf Drabek
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, wugi
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, bz
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Sue...
    • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, Albertito
  • Re: Twin paradox with live webcams, kenseto
• quantum bang, Thomas Heger
  • Re: quantum bang, Neil B.
    • Re: quantum bang, Thomas Heger
• Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?, William Hayes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?, William Hayes
  • Re: How serious are the implications of Einstein relativity's fraud to the honest realm of theoretical physics?, Ilja Schmelzer
• electrons and uncertainty, Thomas Heger
  • Re: electrons and uncertainty, Bill Hobba
    • Re: electrons and uncertainty, Thomas Heger
  • Re: electrons and uncertainty, Eric Gisse
    • Re: electrons and uncertainty, Thomas Heger
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Nemy
• Re: why does science conflict with religion?, walawelo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why does science conflict with religion?, walawelo
• Re: appears to me that relativity is a 100 monkey syndrom, luke . saul
• Re: is relativity like jam on a slice of bread or like powder sugar on a slice of bread?, Igor
• "Corrections to Special Relativity", Nemy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Corrections to Special Relativity", Eef
• Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
  • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, harry
    • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
  • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, JanPB
    • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Jerry
    • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, oldogf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Artful
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Artful
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Androcles
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, PD
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Alen
  • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Martin Hogbin
    • Message not available
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Josef Matz
    • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Josef Matz
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Josef Matz
    • Message not available
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Josef Matz
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Josef Matz
      • Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?, Tom Roberts
• Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, durgesh2487
  • Message not available
    • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, xxein
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, Androcles
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, lithium
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, Androcles
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, lithium
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, Androcles
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, lithium
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, Androcles
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, lithium
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, Androcles
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, xxein
      • Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?, Androcles
• Re: why has light no free will like matter?, Sue...
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Niam
  • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", JanPB
    • Message not available
      • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", JanPB
      • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Koobee Wublee
  • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", bernardZ
    • Message not available
      • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", JanPB
    • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Koobee Wublee
      • Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Eric Gisse
• On variant and invariant SRT, Prometheus
  • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Sue...
    • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Prometheus
      • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Sue...
  • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Bill Hobba
    • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Prometheus
  • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Tom Roberts
    • Re: On variant and invariant SRT, Androcles
• Re: baboon Jeckyl equates sound to light, Johnnie In The Billows
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Niam
• Reason why perpetual motion cannot generate energy, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Reason why perpetual motion cannot generate energy, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Niam
  • Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", oriel36
• Space Shuttle Endeavour Model Spacecraft, aircraftsmodel@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Space Shuttle Endeavour Model Spacecraft, Don Stockbauer
• The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
  • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
    • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, harry
    • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
  • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
  • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, harry
    • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, harry
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, PD
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, PD
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, harry
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
  • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Peri of Pera
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, wugi
  • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Bryan Olson
  • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Alen
    • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Alen
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, jeckyl
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Alen
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, xxein
      • Re: The Measurement of Contraction, Androcles
• Re: What is the substance of atomic shells?, mitchgrav
• Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
  • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
    • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Androcles
  • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Igor
  • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
    • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Igor
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Igor
    • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, PD
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Albertito
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, PD
  • Re: Does gravity address fermions and bosons differently?, Josef Matz
• Light vs gravitational falloff, shalayka
  • Re: Light vs gravitational falloff, Sue...
    • Re: Light vs gravitational falloff, shalayka
      • Re: Light vs gravitational falloff, shalayka
      • Re: Light vs gravitational falloff, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Light vs gravitational falloff, Sue...
      • Re: Light vs gravitational falloff, shalayka
• "Gravity", Niam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Gravity", Yap
• Expert Style Tips To Instantly Transform Your Figure, xikom03
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Expert Style Tips To Instantly Transform Your Figure, xikom03
• INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Stamenin
  • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Dono
    • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Stamenin
    • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Karandash
  • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Igor
  • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Sue...
    • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Stamenin
      • Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES, Sue...
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities", Niam
• NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Albertito
  • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Albertito
    • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Albertito
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, The TimeLord
    • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, The TimeLord
  • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Albertito
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Albertito
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Albertito
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Eric Gisse
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, jeckyl
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Androcles
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, jeckyl
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Eric Gisse
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, Eric Gisse
  • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
  • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, The TimeLord
    • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, dlzc
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
      • Re: NASA's astonishing evidence that c is not constant: The pioneer anomaly, harry
• You got to see this, Dono
  • Re: You got to see this, Eric Gisse
    • Re: You got to see this, Dono
      • Re: You got to see this, Eric Gisse
  • Re: You got to see this, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: You got to see this, harry
  • Re: You got to see this, luke . saul
    • Re: You got to see this, Dono
      • Re: You got to see this, harry
      • Re: You got to see this, Dono
      • Re: You got to see this, Lady Chacha
• Re: gibon Jeckyl is forcing me to really want to understand relativity, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: gibon Jeckyl is forcing me to really want to understand relativity, jeckyl
• Re: A Funny Thing Happeed on this NG, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: A Funny Thing Happeed on this NG, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A Funny Thing Happeed on this NG, Eric Gisse
• Re: another proof for wrong relativity, this is big, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: another proof for wrong relativity, this is big, Jeckyl
  • Re: another proof for wrong relativity, this is big, Paul Cardinale
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: another proof for wrong relativity, this is big, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: another proof for wrong relativity, this is big, Dono
• Mensa people go into scentific delirium from this song., Sarcastic American!
• Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Albertito
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Dono
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Androcles
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Daryl McCullough
    • Message not available
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Jeckyl
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Jeckyl
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, PD
    • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Albertito
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, jeckyl
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, PD
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Albertito
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, PD
    • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, oriel36
    • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, oriel36
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, PD
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, jeckyl
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, PD
  • Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis, Randy Poe
• "General Relativity Examined", Niam
• Did Einstein kill John F. Kennedy?, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Did Einstein kill John F. Kennedy?, dlzc
    • Re: Did Einstein kill John F. Kennedy?, Androcles
      • Re: Did Einstein kill John F. Kennedy?, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Did Einstein kill John F. Kennedy?, THE_ONE
• Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, Tom Roberts
• The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, bkh99
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Dono
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Albertito
    • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Josef Matz
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
    • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Tom Roberts
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Albertito
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Dono
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Androcles
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
    • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Albertito
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Albertito
      • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, Jeckyl
    • Re: The Pioneer Effect and the Unified Field Theory, OG
• Space Shuttle Orbiter Model Spacecraft, aircraftsmodel@xxxxxxxxx
• Simple question about relativity and space time, reginald . louis
  • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Jeckyl
  • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Androcles
    • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Jeckyl
  • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Jeckyl
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, xxein
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Androcles
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Jeckyl
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, jeckyl
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, PD
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Androcles
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, oriel36
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, oriel36
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, oriel36
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Androcles
  • Re: Simple question about relativity and space time, Martin Hogbin
• Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, PD
  • Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, xxein
    • Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, Jeckyl
    • Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, Androcles
  • Re: why relativity baboons are forcing me to really want to understand relativity?, Dono
• Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?, Jeckyl
• Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Androcles
  • Message not available
    • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Message not available
    • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, YBM
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
  • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
    • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jerry
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent, Paul B. Andersen
  • Emission Theory, astronauts and SR (was: Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent), Eric Baird
    • Re: Emission Theory, astronauts and SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Emission Theory, astronauts and SR, Androcles
      • Re: Emission Theory, astronauts and SR, Eric Baird
• A clock close to a planet, Peter Christensen
  • Re: A clock close to a planet, Androcles
  • Re: A clock close to a planet, Randy Poe
    • Re: A clock close to a planet, Androcles
      • Re: A clock close to a planet, Randy Poe
      • Re: A clock close to a planet, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A clock close to a planet, Androcles
      • Re: A clock close to a planet, Randy Poe
      • Re: A clock close to a planet, Androcles
  • Re: A clock close to a planet, Dono
  • Re: A clock close to a planet, Sue...
• Gravitational and Inertial Mass, Lorentz Force, etc., Jay R. Yablon
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?", Someone occasionally reads your nonsense
• space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
  • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Androcles
    • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, dlzc
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, dlzc
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Cosmik de Bris
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, dlzc
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, dlzc
  • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, jeckyl
  • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
    • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Jeckyl
    • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, brad
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, lithium
      • Re: space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?, Ben Shoemate
• Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Eric Baird
  • Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Simple Simon
    • Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Eric Baird
  • Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Eric Gisse
    • Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Eric Baird
      • Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review (#2), Eric Baird
• idea for fusion is from gravity, noblefuse
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, sldesear
  • Message not available
    • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Paul B. Andersen
• Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Peter Christensen
  • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Androcles
    • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Peter Christensen
      • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Androcles
      • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Peter Christensen
      • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Androcles
  • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Sorry, guys! (On clocks at different heights) -My Mistakes, Surfer
• Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
  • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Jeckyl
    • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
  • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Igor
    • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Jeckyl
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Igor
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Igor
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Igor
  • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Albertito
      • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Gravitational field and thermodynamics on chlorine monofluoride molecules, Dono
• Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Peter Christensen
  • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Androcles
    • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Jeckyl
  • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Androcles
      • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Peter Christensen
      • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Androcles
      • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, The TimeLord
  • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, The TimeLord
    • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Alternative Representations of Relativity -What does Mr. Roberts and others say?, The TimeLord
• Re: why in order for me to understand relativity i need to really want to understand relativity, Jeckyl
• Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Jeckyl
  • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, harry
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, kk
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Jeckyl
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, harry
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Dono
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, kk
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Androcles
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, jeckyl
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Randy Poe
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, harry
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, kk
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, harry
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Jeckyl
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, kk
      • Message not available
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, jeckyl
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, kk
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, jeckyl
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, kk
      • Message not available
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, jeckyl
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Dono
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Dono
    • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Dono
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, sldesear
  • Re: why was Einstein not nobelized for his relativity?, Igor
• time and space, sarah
  • Re: time and space, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: time and space, Koobee Wublee
  • Re: time and space, wugi
  • Re: time and space, The TimeLord
    • Re: time and space, jeckyl
      • Re: time and space, The TimeLord
      • Re: time and space, jeckyl
    • Re: time and space, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: time and space, The TimeLord
      • Re: time and space, jeckyl
• TTTTiiiimmmmeeee ddddiiiillllaaaattttiiiioooonnnn, Lngth cntrctn, Albertito
  • Re: TTTTiiiimmmmeeee ddddiiiillllaaaattttiiiioooonnnn, Lngth cntrctn, Peri of Pera
• Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Androcles
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Jeckyl
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Jeckyl
  • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Thomas Heger
    • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Josef Matz
      • Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1, Androcles
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, Vres
  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, vanep
• Re: Where physics went wrong, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Where physics went wrong, Androcles
    • Re: Where physics went wrong, Jeckyl
  • Re: Where physics went wrong, John Kennaugh
    • Re: Where physics went wrong, jeckyl
      • Re: Where physics went wrong, richardwarman2009
      • Re: Where physics went wrong, John Kennaugh
    • Re: Where physics went wrong, richardwarman2009
• Re: Direct observation of length contraction, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Direct observation of length contraction, Dono
• Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
  • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
    • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
    • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, snapdragon31
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, snapdragon31
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, snapdragon31
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, jeckyl
  • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, snapdragon31
    • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, snapdragon31
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
  • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, sldesear
  • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Dono
    • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, JanPB
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, whoami
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, whoami
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, jeckyl
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Dono
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Karandash
      • Re: Time Dilation achieves isotropic Speed, Peri of Pera
• Re: where is the missing space stored?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: where is the missing space stored?, harry
• Relativistic picnic, Albertito
  • Re: Relativistic picnic, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Relativistic picnic, Albertito
      • Re: Relativistic picnic, Jeckyl
    • Re: Relativistic picnic, Peter Christensen
  • Re: Relativistic picnic, Jeckyl
  • Re: Relativistic picnic, Tom Roberts
• Re: Kerr describes the history of his metric, George Hammond
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Randy Poe
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, sldesear
• Re: where is the missing time saved?, Igor
• Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Ockham
  • Message not available
    • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Don Stockbauer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: Was Einstein Clinically Insane?, Randy Poe
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?, Vres
• Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GOD AND STOOGES OF PHYSICS, George Hammond
• I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Albertito
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Jeckyl
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Ockham
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, harry
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Sue...
    • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Jeckyl
      • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Eric Gisse
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, JanPB
    • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Ockham
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Eric Gisse
    • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Mike Fontenot
      • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Mike Fontenot
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, Thomas Heger
  • Re: I got stuck on Part II of Special Theory of Relativity (by Albert Einstein) textbook, please help, PD
• Re: One comment on my article., socratus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: One comment on my article., socratus
    • Re: One comment on my article., Jeckyl
• Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
    • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Dono
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Ken S. Tucker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Sue...
    • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity, The TimeLord
• Re: Brigadier General Says Israel Is The Problem, Not Iraq/Afghanistan/Iran/Libya/Syria/Egypt/Jordan, Dono
• Re: Stupidest Moron Award 2008" - till now nominations, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: Stupidest Moron Award 2008" - till now nominations, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Stupidest Moron Award 2008" - till now nominations, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Stupidest Moron Award 2008" - till now nominations, Jeckyl
• New "Journal", andrewgeorges93
  • Re: New "Journal", xxein
    • Re: New "Journal", Jeckyl
  • Re: New "Journal", harry
• Re: why is gravity monopole and only goes from up to down and not in opposite direction?, xxein
  • Re: why is gravity monopole and only goes from up to down and not in opposite direction?, Ockham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why is gravity monopole and only goes from up to down and not in opposite direction?, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: why is gravity monopole and only goes from up to down and not in opposite direction?, Jeckyl
• Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
  • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
    • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Ockham
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
  • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Ockham
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Androcles
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., jeckyl
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Dono
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., G
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., jeckyl
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Androcles
      • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper., Jeckyl
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, snapdragon31
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, snapdragon31
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, snapdragon31
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, oriel36
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON & POE BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX -OLSON BELIEVES IN TICK FAIRIES!, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Artful
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, darke
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Randy Poe
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Bryan Olson
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, bz
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Jeckyl
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
    • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Androcles
  • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX, BradGuth
• Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Ockham
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
    • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea., Jeckyl
• Re: why the ireversibility and the passage of time went backwards before year 0000 ?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why the ireversibility and the passage of time went backwards before year 0000 ?, Randy Poe
• Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Jeckyl
  • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
    • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Jeckyl
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Jeckyl
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, jeckyl
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, jeckyl
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, jeckyl
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, kenseto
      • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, jeckyl
    • Re: Math is Easy, Physics is Hard, Jeckyl
• Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
  • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, xxein
    • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, xxein
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Ockham
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, xxein
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, xxein
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, xxein
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Androcles
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Ockham
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Ockham
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
    • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Ockham
  • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Albertito
    • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Jeckyl
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Albertito
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Ockham
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Albertito
      • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, Ockham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks, xxein
• Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
    • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, andrewgeorges93
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jerry
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jerry
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Dono
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Androcles
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, PD
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Ockham
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, THE_ONE
    • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jerry
    • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jerry
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jeckyl
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Jerry
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
    • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, Dono
      • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?, rbwinn
• Re: The Reason for Time Dilation, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Reason for Time Dilation, bz