Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:58:58 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 9:20 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:14069db1-afd7-42d1-afd5-b7f728f5a3fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, I never did get to thank you for helping me get the bugs out
of these equations.
You didn't you just tried changing some letters to hide them.
Anyway, Jeckyl, this thread was supposed to be
about how civil relativists are compared to people who question them.
I have never seen it. They all get totally insulting every time I
post anything.
Probably because you are so rude yourself.
Last time you just wandered off when I arrived at the
equations I posted here and figured out what they meant.
No .. you just stopped posting .. I had assumed youd given up on them as a
lost cause after having them shown incorrect so many many times
Really I am
[snip the same crap that we already know you are using]
Well, good talking to you, Jeckyl. Let me know if you have any
questions.
Why the hell did you come back and start posting your crap again? .. did you
think we'd forgotten? .. I notice that that is a habit of yours .. you post
them for a while, everyone proves you wrong, you disappear (maybe to catch
up on your welding) and then months later you return to try it all again.
What a sad little life you must have.
Well, Jeckyl, since you say you have proven me wrong so many times, go
right ahead. Talk is cheap. Here are the equations.
x=wt
w=velocity of light
x'=x-vt
t'=t
x'=wn'
wn'=wt-vt
n'=t(1-v/w)
w = x/t = x'/n' = (x-vt)/(t-vt/w) = (x-vt)/(t-vx/c^2) =
(x-vt)gamma/(t-vx/c^2)gamma
= x'Lorentz/t'Lorentz
What is wrong? You said you proved something, and I did not
believe you? Go ahead and do it again, and you can show your
scientist friends how much you know.
I say you are all done. You will not even try.
What happened to science? Half of the posts in this newsgroup
used to be scientists showing me how stupid I was. Now none of them
will even talk to me. Can't find a mistake? Well, that happens
sometimes.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- References:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|