Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:22:35 +1100
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:15db2cdc-e25f-439a-955d-434e2ed742cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, Jeckyl, since you say you have proven me wrong so many times, go
right ahead.
Why bother .. you are to stupid to understand it. And its been done so many
times .. there is little entertainment value left in it. Just take it as
read that I have disproved them, and then (as always) you can just ignore it
and keep to your irrational beliefs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- References:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by Date: Re: Ohm/Kirchoff in special relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|