Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:58:46 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 1, 4:39 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5b9c1906-f552-47b0-88f1-196ef613623b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 1, 3:46 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f99bfa92-c08d-4c70-84d1-1a39bc16c8f9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 10:22 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:15db2cdc-e25f-439a-955d-434e2ed742cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, Jeckyl, since you say you have proven me wrong so many times,
go
right ahead.
Why bother .. you are to stupid to understand it. And its been done
so
many
times .. there is little entertainment value left in it. Just take it
as
read that I have disproved them, and then (as always) you can just
ignore
it
and keep to your irrational beliefs.
I am too stupid to understand?
Yes .. that was clear from your previous posts.
[snip more stupidity from ignorant rb]
Well, another scientist who does not want to discuss time. Who would
have thought it?
I have 'discussed' time, and many subjects, with you many many times before
.. you are simply too ignorant and stupid for there to be any worthwhile
goal in doing so .. why do you think I'd want to subject myself to the
frustration of trying to 'discuss' science again with an uneducated moron
like you who doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. I doubt anyone
else will be interesting in your misguided ramblings.
Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in
this newsgroup were directed at me. Now that I have defined t'=t, no
one wants to talk. So why don't you just run along and do what you
want to do?
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- References:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Prev by Date: Re: Special Relativity is saved from collapse by means of silly algebraic tricks
- Next by Date: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|