Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:79c8c68b-c3b0-4b2d-a602-2172f93540ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 1, 4:39 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in
this newsgroup were directed at me. Now that I have defined t'=t, no
one wants to talk.

There is nothing more to say .. your self-contradictory theory is as
self-contradictory as it always was.

So why don't you just run along and do what you
want to do?

That's is what I am doing.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts ... this newsgroup were directed at me. ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in ... this newsgroup were directed at me. ... your self-contradictory theory is as ... one would have to wonder why you are so reluctant to show what ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in ... this newsgroup were directed at me. ... your self-contradictory theory is as ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... there is little entertainment value left in it. ... Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in ... this newsgroup were directed at me. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... there is little entertainment value left in it. ... Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in ... this newsgroup were directed at me. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)