Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:43:22 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 1, 5:05 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:79c8c68b-c3b0-4b2d-a602-2172f93540ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 1, 4:39 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in
this newsgroup were directed at me. Now that I have defined t'=t, no
one wants to talk.
There is nothing more to say .. your self-contradictory theory is as
self-contradictory as it always was.
Well, one would have to wonder why you are so reluctant to show what
you claim is contradiction. Here are the equations.
x=wt
w=velocity of light
x'=x-vt
x'=wn'
n'=t(1-v/w)
To be honest I would still be using Einstein's equation x'=ct',
although in the modified form x'=wt', if you had not shown me the
error. If they give me the Nobel Prize, I am going to give it to you,
even though it should probably go to Galilleo.
So why don't you just run along and do what you
want to do?
That's is what I am doing.
Wonderful. Glad to see you have found something you enjoy.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- References:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 1
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|