Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?

On Feb 2, 3:38 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:3d047018-b027-432a-af06-99a78a6e1834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 1, 5:05 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:79c8c68b-c3b0-4b2d-a602-2172f93540ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 1, 4:39 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts in
this newsgroup were directed at me. Now that I have defined t'=t, no
one wants to talk.

There is nothing more to say .. your self-contradictory theory is as
self-contradictory as it always was.

Well, one would have to wonder why you are so reluctant to show what
you claim is contradiction.

I have shown in many many times .. so it is clear I shows no reluctance in
doing so . .ther eis simply no point in redoing it again, simply because you
have the gall to start posting your nonsense in a physics group again

[snip the same crap as before]

Can't refute t'=t, huh, Jeckyl? I guess the last people before me who
thought about using the sun as a clock were the native Americans. I
used to work with a Navajo who glued a digital watch in his welding
helmet, and when anyone would ask him the time, he would look at the
sun through his welding helmet and tell them the time on his watch. I
am not kidding, though. If they give me the Nobel Prize, I am going
to give it to you.
Robert B. Winn
.