Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?

On Feb 2, 6:30�pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:c5384104-a888-4b03-ae35-f09039158b80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 2, 4:42?pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:f6daf1eb-4fb0-4006-87e9-ae758238f79b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 2, 3:38 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:3d047018-b027-432a-af06-99a78a6e1834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 1, 5:05 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:79c8c68b-c3b0-4b2d-a602-2172f93540ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 1, 4:39 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, as I said, when I was making errors, about half of the posts
in
this newsgroup were directed at me. ?Now that I have defined t'=t,
no
one wants to talk.

There is nothing more to say .. your self-contradictory theory is as
self-contradictory as it always was.

Well, one would have to wonder why you are so reluctant to show what
you claim is contradiction.

I have shown in many many times .. so it is clear I shows no reluctance
in
doing so . .ther eis simply no point in redoing it again, simply
because
you
have the gall to start posting your nonsense in a physics group again

[snip the same crap as before]

Can't refute t'=t, huh, Jeckyl?

Of course I can and I have.

[snip more crap and nonsense from idiot rbwinn]

Well, I don't really think so.

We know you don't think. That's you're problem. �That is why there is no
point in explaining the problems to someone who is simply incapable of
understanding the math and the physics invovled- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, I do understand the principle of equivalence. So if a satellite
gets around the earth in fewer ticks of the clock, isn't it at a lower
altitude?
Now with my equations, the altitude of the satellite remains the same
figured from the earth or from the satellite.
I think that is pretty compelling evidence that my equations are
correct.
What do you think, Jeckyl?
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How do I convert Longitude/Latitude/Altitude to XYZ Coordinates? (starter info included)-
    ... *Altitude is the distance a point is away from sea level. ... *Latitude measures vertically on the Earth, ... Today it's as high as a satellite and I can't see ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Sirrus Notes
    ... If the earth had it's current size and rotational rate but was more or less massive,the geostationary altitude would be higher or lower respectively. ... The orbital velocity of the satellite depends on its altitude above Earth. ... To maintain an orbit that is 22,223 miles above Earth, the satellite must orbit at a speed of about 7,000 mph. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: Sirrus Notes
    ... The orbital velocity of the satellite depends on its altitude above Earth. ... At an altitude of 124 miles, the required orbital velocity is just over 17,000 mph. ... To maintain an orbit that is 22,223 miles above Earth, the satellite must orbit at a speed of about 7,000 mph. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: food from space
    ... Earth, and at the very least move our commercial agriculture into LEO ... Each satellite has a rail gun and fires 2 meals per second - to people ... The mass of 2 meals per second is 1.47 kg per second. ... the asteroid belt earlier.. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • 600 metre frieze of planet Earth around UNESCO (Forwarded)
    ... 600 metre frieze of planet Earth around UNESCO ... A frieze depicting planet Earth -- made up of 1:1000000 scale satellite ... Planet initiative set up satellite programmes that are designed to enhance ...
    (sci.space.news)