Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:48:12 +1100
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a1cf233e-5630-47f7-884c-5a3b908e1acc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 2, 7:11?pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well DERR ... we all known (those of us who acutally understand physics)
that t' = t in Galillean equations. ?We also know that you cannot have
something with the same meaured speed in every frame of reference when
galillean transforms are used. It is simply impossible because you end up
with self-contradictory results.
[snip more nonsense from rbwinn, who knows not what he says]
Well, you certainly can.
No .. you cannot
[snip more evidence of rbwinn not even knowing what is being talked about]
.
- References:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by Date: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Index(es):