Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?

On Feb 2, 7:12�pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:666a63c9-3227-4657-af7d-16466d133224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 2, 6:30?pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We know you don't think. That's you're problem. ?That is why there is no
point in explaining the problems to someone who is simply incapable of
understanding the math and the physics invovled- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, I do understand the principle of equivalence.

No .. you don't. �You have shown you clearly have nowhere near the knowledge
of physics or math required to talk about what you ar etalking about.

The principle of equivalence shows that if a baseball is put in orbit
around the earth at the altitude of the moon, it will have the same
velocity as the moon. So explain the velocity and orbit of your
satellite with its slower clock. I can explain it with the Galilean
transformation equations. The clock time is n'. You have to use t'
to compute the orbit and velocity.
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How can DHRs be This Stupid?
    ... a "twisted math". ... 2AB/= c to be a universal constant- the velocity of light in empty ... | solution is to find out how the universe allows us to view and measure ... | yrs.) --- and the physics community at large for the last 20 yrs.) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Ballistic Trajectory With Friction
    ... challenge to myself and as a refresher for my physics and math ... skills. ... with the square of velocity) so your program ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ballistic Trajectory With Friction
    ... challenge to myself and as a refresher for my physics and math ... skills. ... with the square of velocity) so your program ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ballistic Trajectory With Friction
    ... challenge to myself and as a refresher for my physics and math ... skills. ... with the square of velocity) so your program ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: closer moon?
    ... It would fall to Earth and no longer be in orbit. ... Not "physics" wise like you did. ... They took the math approach that is not "physics" ...
    (sci.physics)