Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?

On Feb 5, 9:14 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:20 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 6:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 4:48�pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 5:25�pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:f56bd4bf-bd93-4c71-ab0f-0ab662a52804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Don't feed the troll .. you're playing his game.

On the contrary, it's my game, and he's playing it with me. I used to
make a fair amount of money off suckers in bars in college who thought
they were pretty good at 8-ball.

PD

Well, I am still waiting for the scientist who is going to explain
what is wrong with the Galilean transformation equations being used to
explain the transmission of light the way I use them.

THEY ARE WRONG.

How many variations of "they are wrong - see <example #23423423>" do
you require before you figure out what was known over a century ago?

That is exactly what the church court told Galileo while he was
alive. All you are doing is reciting dogma.

Do you really not understand the difference between
"the book says the answer is 3"
and
"the experiment measures 3.000 to within the
limits of experimental precision"

?

I would say that, on the contrary, sticking to your
beliefs as you do in the face of overwhelming physical
evidence to the contrary constitutes religious faith.
What else would you call it?

- Randy
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... make a fair amount of money off suckers in bars in college who thought ... what is wrong with the Galilean transformation equations being used to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
    ... make a fair amount of money off suckers in bars in college who thought ... what is wrong with the Galilean transformation equations being used to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)