Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:22:28 GMT
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dc58acb7-d9c1-48a0-a83d-cf05e83f729d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 5, 11:13 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 5, 8:21 am, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 5, 9:14 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:20 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 4, 6:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:48�pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 4, 5:25�pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f56bd4bf-bd93-4c71-ab0f-0ab662a52804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Don't feed the troll .. you're playing his game.
On the contrary, it's my game, and he's playing it with me. I
used to
make a fair amount of money off suckers in bars in college who
thought
they were pretty good at 8-ball.
PD
Well, I am still waiting for the scientist who is going to explain
what is wrong with the Galilean transformation equations being
used to
explain the transmission of light the way I use them.
THEY ARE WRONG.
How many variations of "they are wrong - see <example #23423423>" do
you require before you figure out what was known over a century ago?
That is exactly what the church court told Galileo while he was
alive. All you are doing is reciting dogma.
Do you really not understand the difference between
"the book says the answer is 3"
and
"the experiment measures 3.000 to within the
limits of experimental precision"
?
I would say that, on the contrary, sticking to your
beliefs as you do in the face of overwhelming physical
evidence to the contrary constitutes religious faith.
What else would you call it?
- Randy- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well, Randy, you say that you have experimental evidence. Let's just
briefly review the evidence. The first evidence was the perihelon of
the orbit of Mercury. So let's examine that evidence. Mercury is
traveling at a velocity of 30 miles per second. At a velocity of 30
miles per second, n' in my equations, is identical to t' in the
Lorentz equations to several decimal places. So, as you say, this is
indeed religious faith.
| Babble.
We'll snip the babble then.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- References:
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: PD
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: PD
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: PD
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: PD
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by Date: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|