Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?

On Feb 5, 1:37 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 5, 5:14 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Feb 5, 12:20 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 6:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 4:48�pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 5:25�pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:f56bd4bf-bd93-4c71-ab0f-0ab662a52804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Don't feed the troll .. you're playing his game.

On the contrary, it's my game, and he's playing it with me. I used to
make a fair amount of money off suckers in bars in college who thought
they were pretty good at 8-ball.

PD

Well, I am still waiting for the scientist who is going to explain
what is wrong with the Galilean transformation equations being used to
explain the transmission of light the way I use them.

THEY ARE WRONG.

How many variations of "they are wrong - see <example #23423423>" do
you require before you figure out what was known over a century ago?

That is exactly what the church court told Galileo while he was
alive.  All you are doing is reciting dogma.  What I would need to see
is , They are wrong because, and then you show the reason.  Jeckyl did
it one time, but he is a one time wonder.  Now he is no different from
any other scientist because he cannot see a mistake.
Robert B. Winn

THEY ARE WRONG:

See:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, I don't see. All that shows is how the Galilean transformation
equations were used with ether theory. That uses the concept of
absolute time. Absolute time is a concept of time where all clocks
everywhere show the same tine.
I am using the Galilean transformation equations, but not
absolute time.

x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t

The equation t'=t means there is a common reference for time in
S' and S. I explained that I was using degrees of rotation of the
sun. I showed that time on a clock in S' was calculated from n'=t(1-v/
w), etc. So what you are telling me is that you are using what
scientists said in the 1800's about the Galilean transformation
equations as scripture and that it is against your religion for anyone
to use these equations any other way. Well, that is fine. We believe
in freedom of religion here in America. If you want to believe that,
we will just have to respect your religious beliefs.
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition,
    ... the Galilean transformation by resetting clocks, rescaling distance ... However, the *same* synchronization ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
    ... invert the Galilean transformation equations with the variables that I ... that the equations had to work with two clocks running at different ... Robert B. Winn ... I admit that you seem to be unable to grasp the concept that if two ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
    ... invert the Galilean transformation equations with the variables that I ... that the equations had to work with two clocks running at different ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
    ... invert the Galilean transformation equations with the variables that I ... that the equations had to work with two clocks running at different ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)