Re: Are there any civil anti-relativists?


"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:205e2ef3-a6a2-4b84-a3ae-a2616b142595@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 5, 12:12 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"rbwinn" <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:c30ea399-35c3-44a9-b5b8-d68e9e418b39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 5, 10:22 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:dc58acb7-d9c1-48a0-a83d-cf05e83f729d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 5, 11:13 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 5, 8:21 am, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 5, 9:14 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 5, 12:20 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 6:47 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 4:48�pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 4, 5:25�pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:f56bd4bf-bd93-4c71-ab0f-0ab662a52804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Don't feed the troll .. you're playing his game.

On the contrary, it's my game, and he's playing it with me.
I
used to
make a fair amount of money off suckers in bars in college
who
thought
they were pretty good at 8-ball.

PD

Well, I am still waiting for the scientist who is going to
explain
what is wrong with the Galilean transformation equations being
used to
explain the transmission of light the way I use them.

THEY ARE WRONG.

How many variations of "they are wrong - see <example
#23423423>"
do
you require before you figure out what was known over a century
ago?

That is exactly what the church court told Galileo while he was
alive. All you are doing is reciting dogma.

Do you really not understand the difference between
"the book says the answer is 3"
and
"the experiment measures 3.000 to within the
limits of experimental precision"

?

I would say that, on the contrary, sticking to your
beliefs as you do in the face of overwhelming physical
evidence to the contrary constitutes religious faith.
What else would you call it?

- Randy- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, Randy, you say that you have experimental evidence. Let's just
briefly review the evidence. The first evidence was the perihelon of
the orbit of Mercury. So let's examine that evidence. Mercury is
traveling at a velocity of 30 miles per second. At a velocity of 30
miles per second, n' in my equations, is identical to t' in the
Lorentz equations to several decimal places. So, as you say, this is
indeed religious faith.

| Babble.

We'll snip the babble then.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

| Thank you for your comments, Androcles. As I understand it, you say
| that time on Mercury would be the same as time on earth. That would
| work mathematically, but as scientists say, they discovered this
| variance in the perihelon of Mercury back in the 1800's.
| Then they claimed it validated Einstein's theory.
| Robert B. Winn

I've told you before, those are not scientists.
Le Verrier calculated what he could using Newtonian Mechanics
and found the advance of perihelion of Mercury to be 5566 arc
seconds in 100 Earth orbits or 415 Mercury obits.
A slight discrepancy of 43 arc seconds per 415 Mercury orbits
was unaccounted for.
415 * 360 degrees * 60 arc minutes * 60 arc seconds is
537840000 arc seconds, and 43/537840000 * 100 is 0.000008%
which is remarkably good.

If you use GR to calculate the time on Earth vs the time on the Moon
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/2/b/12b6af8d31abe31378245988a0e74f...

tf = 1,000,000 years
gravitational constant G = 6.673E-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
Mass of Earth = 5.9736E+24 kg
r = 385000 km (distance to Moon)
c = 299792.458 km/sec

t0 = 994222.168323667

It is interesting to note that as the Moon goes around the sun
1,000,000 times in 1,000,000 years the Earth only goes around
the sun 994222 times in 1,000,000 years as measured by an
observer on the Moon.

Definitely right off the scale of my bull*** meter, a year on the Moon
is exactly the same as a year on Earth and is also a trip around the
Sun, the Earth and Moon are together and a year is a unit of time,
more so than the day or second because a day is added every 4 years
and leap seconds are added as necessary.

Therefore the "scientists" as you call them are babbling, lying tords
(just like Blind Poe and Fecal Jeckyl) and so was Einstein.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, that was exactly what I was asking these scientists


The only scientist you've spoken to is me. Now quit wasting my time.


.