Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:20:23 GMT
"wugi" <brol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47accedb$0$829$5f6aeac3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "jeckyl" :
| > "Peri of Pera" :
| > > The Measurement of Contraction
| > >
| > > The theory of relativity is presented as one that cannot be understood
| > > by most people.
| >
| > Not 'cannot', just 'is difficult'
|
| Restricting oneself to the usual algebraic axiomatics and the
establishment
| of Lorentz transforms, I had the opposite problem: it seemed too simple,
yet
| it evaded our intuition...
Go a step further.
Intuition says believe what you see and intuition says velocities add.
One conflicts with the other, don't rely on intuition.
If you believe what you see then this pencil broken:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
If you use GR to calculate the time on Earth vs the time on the Moon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation
tf = 1,000,000 years
gravitational constant G = 6.673E-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
Mass of Earth = 5.9736E+24 kg
r = 385000 km (distance to Moon)
c = 299792.458 km/sec
t0 = 994222.168323667
An observer on Earth measures the Moon making ~6 more
orbits around the Sun in a thousand years, as prophesied
by Einstein. You'd think someone would notice by now.
Einstein's pathetic mathematics isn't just counter-intuitive, it's
"believe what you see" crap.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- From: jeckyl
- Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- References:
- The Measurement of Contraction
- From: Peri of Pera
- Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- From: jeckyl
- Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- From: wugi
- The Measurement of Contraction
- Prev by Date: Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- Next by Date: Re: INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES
- Previous by thread: Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- Next by thread: Re: The Measurement of Contraction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|