Re: why relativists believes in bigbang out of nothing?

On Feb 10, 10:14 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"xxein" <xx...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:7dcab5a0-889c-43e6-94d2-da4bbaecc021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 10, 4:11 pm, spoonbender <iw2...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 10, 8:29 pm, durgesh2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

No body said "nothing".
Try reading good references.
No body said "nothing", they just don't know what exactly happen
before the bang.
But that doesn't matter to know the event after it.
So its not much of a concern right now.

are you kidding us?

your "before" involves time

what time are talkin about before
bigbang or whatever?

xxein: Do you have an end with no beginning?

Geez you stupid ***.


I used to have a problem with this too.The whole thing without
causality etc.Its more probable that the creation of our universe
gives us the prospective of time beginning for that universe.Its not
necessarily the beginning of time per say just our prospective of
time.
Take a look at these other series of postings if you want to see a
possible explanation.
space: gravity's effect on time and expansion?
.