Re: Seriously, What Can We Do About It?

On Feb 12, 1:35 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:01:20 +0100, "Josef Matz" <josefm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
You are right.
Discussion not wished in that circles. And these guys claim others to
measure wrong (Nimtz).
In the consequence these people should make free the chairs.

GR is wrong. We should begin to forget it and bury GR.
SR containes mistakes which can be corrected.
Inhomogene waves can have speeds practically unlimited in small room regions
like a few meters.
Both GR and SR deny this. GR was too general because its foundations are
destryed by superluminal effects.
SR can be corrected. But that also means SR foundations must be corrected.
So SR is wrong too.

That is possible.

The physical society could support that task and give Nimtz the Nobel price
which will bring GR to fall
and SR to a completion.

They require an optical experimenter like Nimtz do that all !

Einstein has done some mistakes. But not everything is wrong ! This should
be clear too !

Everything about SR is wrong.
It was based on Einstein's strange 'reasoning' that vertically falling
raindrops take longer to reach the ground when viewed through the window of his
moving train. Their paths clearly became diagonal.

All your whining is negated when Minkowski's metric formulation of SR
is used. Makes sense that you never talk about it in that case.


Josef Matz

Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity is easy to understand if one has the IQ of a parrot and a gullibility index >0.95.

.