Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- From: xxein <xxein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:32:05 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 14, 3:05 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 13, 7:37 pm,xxein<xx...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
xxein: You don't need a diploma to do the physic. All you need is a
logic.
I know you'd like to think so. That is the hope of many an amateur on
this group. It is unfortunately not true. It isn't true for plumbing,
it isn't true for cardiac surgery, it isn't true for the practice of
law, and it isn't true for physics. I haven't got the foggiest idea
why you would think physics would be different.
xxein: So logic is not needed? Or it is a separate logic for
plumbing etc? I can grant the division of logic for/to sub-
categories. That is not the issue.
The issue is whether we can have more than one logic that we use to
understand this universe. I think you will agree that there cannot be
more than one logic that works through the entirety. It is manifested
by the universe, itself, if it has any consistant laws at all.
My statement of logic follows those laws and not a generalised logic
that allows you to hammer a nail.
Did I express this correctly, now?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- From: Androcles
- Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- From: PD
- Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- References:
- Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- From: xxein
- Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- From: PD
- Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- Prev by Date: Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- Next by Date: Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
- Previous by thread: Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- Next by thread: Re: Eric Gisse has no any diploma
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
