Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?

From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc1@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:47:19 -0700

Dear Alen:

"Alen" <alen1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6a7e8403-71d9-4dee-bda8-7a8194bcedd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
....

Why do you so desperately defend an orthodox
view, even if it is indefensible, as the
carelessness of your remarks makes clear?
Since when, for example, has the use of a ruler
in SR been merely an extraordinary or peculiar
'insistence' of my own?

Your paradox was in your unequal standards for time and space.
And you know it. How nice.

David A. Smith

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
  - From: Alen

References:
- A Time Dilation Paradox?
  - From: Alen
- Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
  - From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
  - From: Alen

Prev by Date: Re: Summary of The Unified Field Theory
Next by Date: Re: Poincaré's 1900 paper on Lorentz
Previous by thread: Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
Next by thread: Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
... carelessness of your remarks makes clear? ... Since when, for example, has the use of a ruler ... The problem is you are attacking Smiffy's blind faith in his religion ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: A Time Dilation Paradox?
... carelessness of your remarks makes clear? ... Since when, for example, has the use of a ruler ... that the measurements were different in kind. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)