Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:33:23 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 15, 8:35 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:23 pm, babalu...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
In Carroll's text
Provide a link.
www.google.com "how to use google"
Einestein's equations are obtained from varying the
Hilbert action with respect to the full degrees of freedom of the
metric, i.e. the metric variation is not restricted to preserving
constant signature.
What's a "signature" ?
www.google.com "how to use google"
It's pretty fucking funny that you don't know what the signature of a
metric is even though you have spent years making crank arguments
about general relativity.
The signature of a metric is the number of its' positive & negative
eigenvalues.
I can't help this guy, but at least I know it.
[snip remaining junk]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- References:
- variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: babaluyee
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Prev by Date: Re: I don't get it
- Next by Date: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Previous by thread: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Next by thread: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Index(es):
Loading