Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:08:51 GMT
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Feb 15, 7:11 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:the technique is valid only for SMALL
variations, and the definition of "small" must include not changing the
metric signature.
So is it correct to say that one cannot continuously change the
signature of a metric?
Is a signature change a discontinuous process like a parity inversion?
Certainly. The signature of a metric is an integer, and an integer cannot possibly be changed "continuously".
[Some authors call "+++-" the "signature"; others use
the sum +1+1+1-1=2; I mean the latter sense here.]
Tom Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- References:
- variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: babaluyee
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- From: Eric Gisse
- variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Prev by Date: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Next by Date: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Previous by thread: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Next by thread: Re: variation of appropriate degrees of freedom of metric
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|