Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:28:46 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 24, 5:33 am, "Artful" <art...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeup. And, of course, due to that projection, a moving rod really does tkae
up less physical space at any given time than a stationary rod.
No, it doesn't "take up less physical space". It is just a projective
effect THROUGHOUT.
Read references [9][10] here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction#A_trigonometric_effect.3F
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- References:
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Peri of Pera
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: wugi
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on GR sources
- Next by Date: Re: Question on GR sources
- Previous by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Index(es):