Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: "Artful" <artful@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:28:22 +1100
"Dono" <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6d3472f6-4ac8-4049-bae6-df93ace7f92b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 24, 4:03 pm, "Artful" <art...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A 'moving' object DOES take up less 'space' in a 'stationary' frame of
reference at a given time in that frame (and, as you seem to have
problems
with understanding what is meant by that .. the 'moving' and 'stationary'
are wrt the observer).
Try reading from the top.
I have
You are still wrong.
SR says that an object takes up less physical space at any given moment in a
frame of reference in which the object is moving.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- References:
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Peri of Pera
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: wugi
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- Prev by Date: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by Date: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Previous by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|