Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:09:21 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 24, 7:36 pm, "Artful" <art...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nicely put. Now we've just got to convince dono that an object *does*
'physically' have a shorter spatial length (ie take up less physical space;
I had a hunch that you will not get this. This is what happens when
you are more interested in being always right instead of getting it
right <shrug>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: PD
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- References:
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Peri of Pera
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: wugi
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: PD
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- Prev by Date: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by Date: Re: History of relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Index(es):