Re: SR cannot determine Contraction

"Dono" <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e8682090-22ad-46a7-b644-5a61461eb177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 24, 7:36 pm, "Artful" <art...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Nicely put. Now we've just got to convince dono that an object *does*
'physically' have a shorter spatial length (ie take up less physical
space;
I had a hunch that you will not get this. This is what happens when
you are more interested in being always right instead of getting it
right <shrug>

Funny.. that's the opinion I had formed about you.


.