Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: "Artful" <artful@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:45:11 +1100
"Dono" <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c620522f-37f0-40c6-96ec-ad4a2f6acea3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 24, 8:25 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 24, 10:09 pm, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Correct.
On Feb 24, 7:36 pm, "Artful" <art...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nicely put. Now we've just got to convince dono that an object
*does*
'physically' have a shorter spatial length (ie take up less physical
space;
I had a hunch that you will not get this. This is what happens when
you are more interested in being always right instead of getting it
right <shrug>
Let's put it this way. Length is a result obtained through a
prescription, one that typically involves recording two spatial
locations simulataneously. Length is a physical property. However,
because simultaneity is frame-dependent, the physical property length
is also frame-dependent. There is, however, no physical process or
interaction occurring to or in the rod to change its length.
Yes .. it is. And is exactly what I claim.
-This is why one can't close the doors simultaneously in the barn
frame without hitting the pole.
No .. you can (ignoring technical difficulties). There is a point in time
in the reest frame of the barn where the pole is completely within the barn
(whether or not you physically lcose the doors).
-This is why the pole in the barn, being a thought experiment, is a
very poor illustration for length contraction.
No .. its a very good one. Its only poor because it contradication your
misunderstanding about SR
-This is why, to date, we have no experimental test for length
contraction (http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/
experiments.html#Length_Contraction)
Oh dear <sigh>
.
- References:
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Peri of Pera
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: wugi
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: kenseto
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: PD
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Artful
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: PD
- Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- From: Dono
- SR cannot determine Contraction
- Prev by Date: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by Date: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Previous by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Next by thread: Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading