Re: History of relativity
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 25, 7:33 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
The section on history of relativity has been updated
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/researchzone/history.html
That website displays the bias of its author much more strongly than
than any defensible view of the history of science. It is revisionist
history at its worst, as it does not consider the evolution of ideas,
which at base are a major driving force of history, ESPECIALLY in
science. In particular, it fails to mention that Einstein was the
originator of the central idea of (special) relativity: the laws of
physics are unaffected by reference to different inertial frames, and
this can be consistently applied to electrodynamics as well as
mechanics. That website also fails to mention that Einstein's approach
is simpler, more general, and more elegant that that of any of the other
authors it mentions. While Poincare' died before this was sorted out and
well established, Lorentz said it himself in several places (most
notably his revised edition of _Theory_of_Electrons_).
And even more importantly: Einstein's approach has led to all of the
fundamental theories of modern physics; it is quite clear that Lorentz's
approach would not have done so.
Tom Roberts
Well, what do you expect? It is the website of a neo-nazi.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: History of relativity
- From: Lady Chacha
- Re: History of relativity
- References:
- History of relativity
- From: Juan R.
- Re: History of relativity
- From: Tom Roberts
- History of relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: History of relativity
- Next by Date: Re: History of relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: History of relativity
- Next by thread: Re: History of relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|