Re: Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat

On 26 feb, 18:27, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 26, 6:19 am, Albertito <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



I'm going to prove that when the travelling twin B returns
close to twin A at rest, he is younger than A, and A is
younger than B, too. It is saying the twin paradox and
Schrodinger's cat are actually the same phenomenon!.

Special Relativty is just a naive theory trying to describe a
quantum phenomenon known as quantum superposition.
Quantum kinematics is the correct framework for accounting
for the so-called relativistic motions.

The fact that moving B's clock would run slower than A's
clock at rest, is a typical case of quantum superposition,
because there is a symmetry telling us that, in proper B's
frame, it is moving A's clock that runs slower. For systems
which interact continuously with their environments, quantum
decoherence resolves the superposition of states providing
a mechanism for wave function collapses to take place.

Allow me to introduce a new term to you. It is defined as stringing
together jargon words from a discipline in a way that is grammatically
correct, but which carries no real semantic content. It is the
reciting of words attached to concepts that you don't understand, put
together in a way that suggests conceptual connection whether those
concepts are really connected or not. This new term, which you may
hear frequently in response to your posts: "word salad."

PD

Who understand the quantum world? The quantum world is so weird
that it is beyond human's apprehension. If you say that you
understand
QM you're lying. Nobody understands QM. But, QM will be enhanced
in such an extent that nothing of SR and GR will remain in the realm
of physics, both old theories will be wildly gobbled. And all started
as a
joke :-)

.

Relevant Pages