Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction)



"Dono" <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:b7ee185f-8c95-40b3-8da1-
That's too bad, really. I was looking forward to your supporting your
PoV with a paper from before the 1980's ( :-)) (if I understood
correctly).
I am really interested in the resolution of this "stressless length
contraction" , Tom is the last hope, I guess :-)

There is nothing to resolve, as there is no stress involved The proper length of the rod itself (meaning in its own frame of reference) is unchanged. Length contraction is a geometric projection from 4D space-time to the 3D space of a particular frame of reference .. it does not physically change what is being projected from (ie the rod) .. but the projection itself does take up less space (ie it is shorter in length). So (the projection of) the rod fits within the barn.

I suggest you actually read the wiki page link you referred to ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction#A_trigonometric_effect.3F ) and the paper by Janssen. Indeed, read any and all papers and texts on SR to see that your position is incorrect. Length contraction is a real effect in the observers frame .. the contracted object takes up less space at a given time, its length is shorter and so something with a longer proper length can indeed fit within a shorter object (like a pole in a barn). This is what SR predicts .. there really is nothing to argue about here .. if you say length contraction does not happen, then you are saying SR is wrong. It is not a matter of an interpretation.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
    ... the invariant length of an ... object is its length in its own rest frame). ... but does that mean that Lorentz contraction is somehow not ... its projection in other frames of references is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
    ... Your phrase "makes objects shorter" implies a change to the ... but observations made from another frame cannot possibly affect ... barn frame, the pole becomes magically shorter, by virtue of relative ... while the contraction is "stressless". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The true crackpots
    ... >> SR the length contraction is not physical. ... It is the geometric projection of the moving rod onto the ... > between two spacetime events onto the observer's frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The true crackpots
    ... >> ROTFLOL....You don't even understand what length contraction means in SR. ... It is the geometric projection of the moving rod onto the observer's ... with time slowing, we get exactly the same equalization of the light ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evidences for the ether
    ... I agree with that .....in SR length contraction is a geometric effect. ... but in practice there have been no direct measurements (there ... What you are used to calling the length of a rod is really the ... *projection* of the 4-D interval between the two events that mark the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)