Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?
- From: babaluyee@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:27:57 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 28, 2:10 pm, diego <6fre3hu8e...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
amazin, adolf einstine gets a nobel proving
gravity is not a force by geometry,
then tha rest of his life, they say, he struggled
to unite gravity with EM and weak and strong forces
but he already said gravity was not a force
what kind of nobel price was that?
His was attempting to unite gravity with EM by showing that EM too was
not a force but a result of geometry. To do this he tried modifying
some aspects of general relativity. Modern attempts to unite them are
very different from his. They are based on the fact that the metric is
a field, and can be treated analogously to quantum fields underlying
EM. They try to quantize the metric field.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Is the extrinsic curvature of a curve related to its 4-acceleration?
- Next by Date: Re: Need opinions for theory.
- Previous by thread: Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?
- Next by thread: Re: if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces?
- Index(es):