Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0



I have a question: Consider the path integral:

Z = DA exp[-iS(A)] = C exp [iW(J)]

where S(A) = $d^4x L.

Above, the field variable is A, the source of the field is J, the
amplitude is W(J), the action is S(A), the Lagrangian density is L, and
C is an overall product factor independent of J and often containing a
product of inverse determinants.

Let's posit that L=0, everywhere. We take that as a supposition.
Perhaps 0 = some other expression involving the sources and fields, but
nonetheless, this expression L is always = 0.

Would the following deductions be true / permissible?

1) S(A) = 0, because the integral over a volume of anything which is
zero, is itself zero. No constants of integration come into play. For
example, thinking about Maxwell's equations in integral form, if there
is a three volume within which the charge is zero everywhere, then the
total enclosed charge is zero.

if 1) is true, then:

2) Z = DA, because exp[-iS(A)] = 1

if 2) is true, then:

3) given Z=DA, we can select C such that DA = C. Then, exp [iW(J)] =1.

if 3) is true, then

4) W(J) = 2pi n and so is quantized.

Please evaluate and advise if there is any flaw in this logic.

Thanks,

Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... |>|>| during this race is zero, ... |>|>velocity, you stupid cunt, and the velocity is zero. ... |>We know that already, neither does Phuckwit Duck. ... you'll never understand integration. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0
    ... Would the following deductions be true / permissible? ... zero, is itself zero. ... No constants of integration come into play. ... total enclosed charge is zero. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: A question on Diracs GR book
    ... Now you can use Stokes theorem / integration by parts, ... vector field over a region is equal to the integral of the normal ... then the RHS of Stokes theorem is trivially zero. ... infinity" sufficiently fast, so the boundary integral can be taken to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A question on Diracs GR book
    ... how does this fit with what Dirac is saying? ... meant to say that the variation of that integral is zero, ... The integral in question _is_ the variation, ... Abandon "integration by parts", it is confusing you. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How to get probability of chi-sqares distribution?
    ... func = @chi2pdf; ... I think that in the latter case, the integration range is bigger than ... When you give such a large range as 0 to 1514, 'quad' ... it finds is that all the values are zero or almost zero, ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)