sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: time intervals
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Igor
• Re: another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: stone
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: stone
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: ferro
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: ferro
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Causality"
  • From: Kon
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: dark energy and Casimir force
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bz
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Revised Paper on Kaluza-Klein and Intrinsic Spin, Based on Spatial Isotropy
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: dark energy and Casimir force
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Tensor curvature of space-time and orbits
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lambda
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics.
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bz
• Re: why relativity baboon PD use that unpleasant language when defeated?
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: beta decay (geometric)
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Revised Paper on Kaluza-Klein and Intrinsic Spin, Based on Spatial Isotropy
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: Eoghan
• Re: momentum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: beta decay (geometric)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bz
• Re: rotation and lightspeed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Evird
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• discrete precursor of stress energy tensor?
  • From: Graven Water
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• dark energy and Casimir force
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• dark energy (geometric)
  • From: Thomas Heger
• beta decay (geometric)
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Lambda
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics.
  • From: JimJast
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lambda
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: rotation and lightspeed
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: bart5050
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tensor curvature of space-time and orbits
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Tensor curvature of space-time and orbits
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: rotation and lightspeed
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why baboon PD insists he is that stupid?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lambda
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: why baboon PD insists he is that stupid?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: why a force is not a real force but gravity condensed?
  • From: xxein
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: Eoghan
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Relativistic problem
  • From: Eoghan
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• nomination update, baboon PD got his 3rd nomination
  • From: stum
• Re: why a force is not a real force but gravity condensed?
  • From: stum
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• why baboon PD insists he is that stupid?
  • From: stum
• time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: why relativity baboon PD use that unpleasant language when defeated?
  • From: stum
• Re: momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: why relativity baboon PD use that unpleasant language when defeated?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Evird
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: they are forcing me to understand relativity by not understanding
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The faeces of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Lambda
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: they are forcing me to understand relativity by not understanding
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why a force is not a real force but gravity condensed?
  • From: xxein
• Re: why relativity baboon PD use that unpleasant language when defeated?
  • From: xxein
• Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: how can ufo fly without pollution?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Lambda
  • From: xxein
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: nomination update, PD added
  • From: Androcles
• Re: rotation and lightspeed
  • From: Thomas Heger
• nomination update, PD added
  • From: thermos
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: they are forcing me to understand relativity by not understanding
  • From: PD
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: they are forcing me to understand relativity by not understanding
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: why relativists believes in life on other planets, but not in UFO?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: how can ufo fly without pollution?
  • From: Igor
• Re: momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: bart5050
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: PD
• Re: momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Androcles
• rotation and lightspeed
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Raghar
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: momentum
  • From: harry
• Re: how can ufo fly without pollution?
  • From: philo
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lambda
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: bart5050
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can the constancy of metric signature over space-time be derived from some other principle?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Can the constancy of metric signature over space-time be derived from some other principle?
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: momentum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lambda
  • From: xxein
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: ppoephd
• Re: The problem of time in quantum cosmology
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Question on dark matter?
  • From: bart5050
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• momentum
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: how can ufo fly without pollution?
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: PD
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why usenet users loves to hate relativists?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Igor
• Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• The problem of time in quantum cosmology
  • From: mariaodete.sm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Lambda
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Flatulence
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Paradoxes
  • From: Bob Cain
• I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: oliveroyanadel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Can the constancy of metric signature over space-time be derived from some other principle?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: PD
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: do i need to understand relativity entirely?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Can the constancy of metric signature over space-time be derived from some other principle?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: General relativity was much bigger than Einstein could imagine of it himself.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: John Park
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: General relativity was much bigger than Einstein could imagine of it himself.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the constancy of metric signature over space-time be derived from some other principle?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: bz
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bz
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• General relativity was much bigger than Einstein could imagine of it himself.
  • From: Franky
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Can the constancy of metric signature over space-time be derived from some other principle?
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Dono
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: xxein
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: xxein
• Re: supersymmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: xxein
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: xxein
• Re: supersymmetry
  • From: xxein
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Nonsymmetric Christoffel's.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Nonsymmetric Christoffel's.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: lithium
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Androcles
• The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: lithium
• Question about interaction between two photons
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: Raghar
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Alen
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Alen
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Paradoxes
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Paradoxes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: supersymmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: supersymmetry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: xxein
• Re: supersymmetry
  • From: xxein
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: xxein
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: PD
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: PD
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: PD
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: PD
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: PD
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: PD
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Paradoxes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Nonsymmetric Christoffel's.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: why is relativity wrong on page 132?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Paradoxes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: how many fundamental forces are there?
  • From: Igor
• Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: alt.morons
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Igor
• alt.morons
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: supersymmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Paradoxes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: WHY BARON REES IS THE BOSS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: WHY BARON REES IS THE BOSS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Nonsymmetric Christoffel's.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nonsymmetric Christoffel's.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• supersymmetry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: kenseto
• Nonsymmetric Christoffel's.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• The contraction paradigm shift by PeRi
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: WHY BARON REES IS THE BOSS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY
  • From: Androcles
• Instrinsic Spin and Klauza Klein: Updated Version with Heisenberg canonical commutation relationship
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: xxein
• Re: cosmology
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: cosmology
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: xxein
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: cosmology
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Dono
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Dono
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Dono
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: EdgarOwen
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Why is QT paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Redne
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: xxein
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: xxein
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: xxein
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: xxein
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• A Possible Kaluza-Klein Experiment
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why is relativity wrong on page 132?
  • From: philo
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Igor
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why is relativity wrong on page 132?
  • From: philo
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Igor
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Redne
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: George Hammond
• Boomerang works in space: Japanese astronaut
  • From: Albertito
• OT (Thermodynamics) but humerous
  • From: philo
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: cosmology
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: why usenet users loves to hate relativists?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: what job a relativists is qualified for?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: cosmology
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: xxein
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• The weird principle of black hole propulsion observed inside several milky way nebulae
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: xxein
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: xxein
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: xxein
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Igor
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: 4vector
• Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: cosmology
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: EdgarOwen
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Redne
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: EdgarOwen
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Sue...
• New Metric permitting a unified theory
  • From: arclein
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: xxein
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: xxein
• Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: EdgarOwen
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: did einstine stole his relaticity from hg wells?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Igor
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: EdgarOwen
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: light cones
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• jobs
  • From: usha
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: universe simulator
  • From: EdgarOwen
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Dono
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• universe simulator
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: bz
• Re: why kids are better to relativity than everybody else?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Puzzle: on how FTL information is received by an observer
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: light cones
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: light cones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: light cones
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: light cones
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Matrix Reloaded (or how de Broglie Hypothesis can be theoretically deduced)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a programm
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: aick
• Re: light cones
  • From: PD
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: John Park
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Matrix Reloaded (or how de Broglie Hypothesis can be theoretically deduced)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• The Matrix Reloaded (or how de Broglie Hypothesis can be theoretically deduced)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• cosmology
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: who got the Nobel prize for DDT, GMO, fluoride in water, amalgam, AIDS, arbeit macht frei, building 7 and moon landing?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: who got the Nobel prize for DDT, GMO, fluoride in water, amalgam, AIDS, arbeit macht frei, building 7 and moon landing?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Arthur Knight HAS GOT IT RIGHT Please don't plagorise..
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: nade
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
  • From: NoEinstein
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Redne
• light cones
  • From: ML
• Re: a programm
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: You guys stop exagerating.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Who knows the story of Einstein watching bears at the zoo?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Who knows the story of Einstein watching bears at the zoo?
  • From: mail2300
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• You guys stop exagerating.
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: You guys stop exagerating.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Question on metric variation
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Redne
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: harry
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: harry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Redne
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: John Park
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: harry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: harry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: harry
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: harry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: mL
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: mL
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Amine
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: PD
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: nade
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: mL
• Re: THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?
  • From: nade
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: harry
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Fountain of Energy!!!
  • From: alanejackson
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: mL
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: PD
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Artlu
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: goog
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: why relativists believe only that they get served through the tube?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: lithium
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Light bending solved
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: PD
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: PD
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why relativists believe only that they get served through the tube?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why relativists believe only that they get served through the tube?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• who got the Nobel prize for DDT, GMO, fluoride in water, amalgam, AIDS, arbeit macht frei, building 7 and moon landing?
  • From: woller
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Light bending solved
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: PD
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Shubee
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Artlu
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Rotations falsify Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: goog
• Re: Nimtz double prism experiment - the mathematics - answer to eric gisse
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nimtz double prism experiment - the mathematics - answer to eric gisse
  • From: Jerry
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question on metric variation
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: mL
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• LOOKS LIKE i WILL HAVE TO USE THE KEY FOR YOU
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: How long can they keep this up?
  • From: dlzc
• 2590 Availables Solutions manuals
  • From: BERGH
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• why relativists believe only that they get served through the tube?
  • From: macarone
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: macarone
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: macarone
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: macarone
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: Igor
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Artlu
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: goog
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Amine
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Paradox
  • From: harry
• "The Key"
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nimtz double prism experiment - the mathematics - answer to eric gisse
  • From: Dono
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Alen
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Nimtz double prism experiment - the mathematics - answer to eric gisse
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: cabbage
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Paradox
  • From: cabbage
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: cabbage
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Key"
  • From: cabbage
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• why relativists are using different names to same thing?
  • From: cabbage
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: bz
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Circular motion in SR
  • From: bz
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Igor
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Paradox
  • From: harry
• Circular motion in SR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nimtz double prism experiment - the mathematics - answer to eric gisse
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Dono
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Artlu
• Nimtz double prism experiment - the mathematics - answer to eric gisse
  • From: Josef Matz
• nswer to Gisse how it works
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Paradox
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Update on viewpoint on history of relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Amine
• Paradox
  • From: El Chancla
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Why I am hard on science
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: energy theory
  • From: Androcles
• energy theory
  • From: bilalmohammed1
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Will it ever be possible to view an atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: OG
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: gaby de wilde
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Pmb
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Will it ever be possible to view an atom?
  • From: Sue...
• Will it ever be possible to view an atom?
  • From: salmon
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: mckenna
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: mckenna
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Albertito
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Albertito
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why I am hard on science
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Igor
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Igor
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: fields
  • From: Carola
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Carola
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Carola
• Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation --
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question on metric variation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Artlu
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: harry
• The secret quantum kernel of relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Amine
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Amine
• Re: fields
  • From: Carola
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Carola
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: fields
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: fields
  • From: Carola
• Re: about spinning quaternions
  • From: Carola
• fields
  • From: Thomas Heger
• about spinning quaternions
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: vanep
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: vanep
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Arthur Knight HAS GOT IT RIGHT Please don't plagorise..
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: karamihas
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question on metric variation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Jerry
• scientific rubbish
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Question on metric variation
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on metric variation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Simultaneity by PeRi
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: xxein
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Question on metric variation
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: bz
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: scientific rubbish
  • From: vanep
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: mckenna
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: mckenna
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: why string theory appears more real to my intuition?
  • From: mckenna
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: mckenna
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Randy Poe
• the proof is here, relativists are hateing laboratories and measurement instruments
  • From: mckenna
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: mckenna
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: mckenna
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Sue...
• Apparent faster-than-light travel: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: hello
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: harry
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: iuval
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: iuval
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: iuval
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Sue...
• Mach's principle and aether
  • From: Amine
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Josef Matz
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Artlu
• Second draft on newtonian limit of GR
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Arthur Knight HAS GOT IT RIGHT Please don't plagorise..
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jets
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Underwear_Womens
  • From: shoesbootjeans
• Mens Underwear
  • From: shoesbootjeans
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why string theory appears more real to my intuition?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: xxein
• Re: why string theory appears more real to my intuition?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Jets
  • From: xxein
• Most equovelents are a con when they........
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Jets
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: quadrature
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• why string theory appears more real to my intuition?
  • From: quadrature
• Re: Most equovelents are a con when they........
  • From: quadrature
• why is gravity stronger than EM, while they say is not?
  • From: quadrature
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: quadrature
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: quadrature
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Poincar's 1900 paper on Lorentz
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Androcles
• "Gravity"
  • From: Artlu
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• The reason why NASA won't confirm this and other Martian fossils
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Can all SR be deduced from the mass correction alone?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Juan R.
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Eef
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SPLITTING and PAIRING new Black hole cycle scenario.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: U235
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: xxein
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: xxein
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: xxein
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: xxein
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: xxein
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: xxein
• Re: SPLITTING and PAIRING new Black hole cycle scenario.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: iuval
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: iuval
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: iuval
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Eef
• Re: Equivalence Principle Violated in Radiation?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: cartilage
• Re: why relativists hates hardware?
  • From: yu5iwo97
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• SPLITTING and PAIRING new Black hole cycle scenario.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: vanep
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eef
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: why relativists hates hardware?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
  • From: conquistadore
• Re: why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
  • From: conquistadore
• Re: why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
  • From: conquistadore
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why relativists hates hardware?
  • From: conquistadore
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: why relativists hates hardware?
  • From: Igor
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: PD
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• invariance of negative signature of the metric?
  • From: iuval
• integrating Einstein's field eqns in a spacelike direction
  • From: iuval
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Compelling solution to quantum gravity proposed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: saul
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Squeeze four dimensions into three
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Compelling solution to quantum gravity proposed
  • From: amayer@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: lithium
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: xxein
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• why relativists hates hardware?
  • From: ernesto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Albertito
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: dlzc
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Albertito
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Albertito
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: wugi
• Special and General Relativity theories are absolutely correct
  • From: Albertito
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: harry
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: Lady Chacha
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Eef
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Electrtrodynamic Potentials and Non-Linear QED
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: History of relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: lithium
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Squeeze four dimensions into three
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Alen
• Re: how does the real light looks alike?
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• how does the real light looks alike?
  • From: ernesto
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: ulrich
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: ulrich
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Eef
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea."
  • From: Laurent
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Alen
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Albertito
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: wugi
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Alen
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Artful
• Re: why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
  • From: xxein
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: PD
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Artful
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: wugi
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: how small a black hole can be?
  • From: galapagos
• Re: how small a black hole can be?
  • From: galapagos
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: how small a black hole can be?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: galapagos
• Re: how small a black hole can be?
  • From: galapagos
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: George Hammond
• why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
  • From: galapagos
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: kk
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Igor
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: xxein
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Nimtz and Haibels book now in english - superluminal tunneling
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Eef
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: harry
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: PD
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Alen
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Alen
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: Artful
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• How does one use a Minkowski diagram?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Artful
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula.
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how small a black hole can be?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Anomalous geniuses of physcis
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: karamihas
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Kaluza Klein and the Fifth Dimension -- Journal Submission
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Alen
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: xxein
• Re: why there is no time dilation when doing relativity at a slower speed of light?
  • From: xxein
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: PD
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: PD
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: philo
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Igor
• Re: Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea."
  • From: oriel36
• why there is no time dilation when doing relativity at a slower speed of light?
  • From: inocs
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Igor
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: PD
• Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: PD
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: goog
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea."
  • From: Laurent
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Waldron's proof that SR is wrong
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Alen
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Albertito
• GPS' indulgence about GR
  • From: Albertito
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: History of relativity
  • From: DH
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• PRIVATE PHYSICS
  • From: karamihas
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: pmb
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Alen
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: philo
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Photon Instrinsic spin and compactification
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Intrinsic Spin and the Kaluza-Klein Fifth Dimension
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Artful
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Intrinsic Spin and the Kaluza-Klein Fifth Dimension
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Jim Faith
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Another puling elementary question...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Jim Faith
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Eef
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kaluza-Klein paper unifying electrodynamics and gravitation -- PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT
  • From: Edward Green
• it is not a joke, relativity baboon PD understand relativity by not understanding
  • From: inocs
• Re: Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Martian blueberries found to be 3D Haversian systems
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: philo
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Jim Faith
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Jim Faith
• relativity, anger, swearing
  • From: steve O
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: Artful
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: Artful
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Artful
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Jim Faith
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: Artful
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea."
  • From: Artful
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Intrinsic Spin and the Kaluza-Klein Fifth Dimension
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Reply To Vird post "Mr. Kennaugh -The Aether is not a terrible idea."
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Jim Faith
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: xxein
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: Artful
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Artful
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jerry
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Looking for electronic copy of Oskar Klein, Quantum theory and five dimensional theory of relativity, Z. Phys. 37 895-906 (1926).
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: inocs
• Re: Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation
  • From: inocs
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: bz
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: oriel36
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Referee Report on Kaluza Klein Paper
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Eef
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Referee Report on Kaluza Klein Paper
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Albertito
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Referee Report on Kaluza Klein Paper
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Referee Report on Kaluza Klein Paper
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Dono
• Referee Report on Kaluza Klein Paper
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: I don't get it
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: Question on GR sources
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The anomaly terminator
  • From: OG
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: lithium
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Artful
• Re: GPS CLOCK PARADOX
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: Artful
• Re: Dono not honest enough to admit his mistake?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Artful
• Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction)
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: Need opinions for theory.
  • From: bz
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Artful
• Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction)
  • From: Artful
• Re: TOM ROBERTS - Dono is confused, please help him out (was SR cannot determine Contraction)
  • From: Artful
• Re: About Nimtz superluminal
  • From: Bill Hobba