Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 01:40:10 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 7, 10:00 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:02 am, iuval <cle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there a theorem saying that if the metric starts out with a
negative signature on a spacelike surface (one or three eigenvalues
negative) that the field equations will preserve this negative
signature for all future and past?
No. The Spacetime equation is a short cut to write down all the
equations of the Lorentz transform into one single equation. It was a
lazy-man's way of doing so, but over the years, it became a Gospel
treasured by the SR and the GR worshippers.
That's right, when I suggested General
Covariance enables a signature choice,
to unchain the brains, I got yelled at.
It's a psychosis, some people want to
remain chained up and imprisoned so I
figure to allow that, it's a choice.
Most people are more comfortable being
being tied up, and that's good, keeps
the poop off the sidewalks.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- References:
- invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: iuval
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Prev by Date: SPLITTING and PAIRING new Black hole cycle scenario.
- Next by Date: Re: who got the nobel price for tha invention of tha nucular weapan?
- Previous by thread: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Next by thread: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|