Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:42:52 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 7, 9:00 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:02 am, iuval <cle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there a theorem saying that if the metric starts out with a
negative signature on a spacelike surface (one or three eigenvalues
negative) that the field equations will preserve this negative
signature for all future and past?
No. The Spacetime equation is a short cut to write down all the
equations of the Lorentz transform into one single equation. It was a
lazy-man's way of doing so, but over the years, it became a Gospel
treasured by the SR and the GR worshippers. <shrug>
In other words, Koobee Wublee does not know what a metric signature
is.
What if there were 5 dimensions?
It depends on how neat of a concise equation you can write from all
the 5 equations of the Lorentz transform in 5 dimensions. <shrug>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: quadrature
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- References:
- invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: iuval
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Prev by Date: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Next by Date: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Next by thread: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|