Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?

On Mar 8, 1:41 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 8, 11:28 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 8, 7:42 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
when I suggested General
Covariance enables a signature choice,
to unchain the brains, I got yelled at.

In pseudo-Reiemannian geometry one must ALWAYS select a sign convention
that fixes the signature of the metric (actually this is also true in
Riemannian geometry, but nobody picks a signature of --- so the issue
never arises in practice).

Dr. Tucker shall use advanced apparatus

You do not have a doctorate in anything.

I minimize paperwork my boy, them who
needs to know do, and "E"ric you don't
need to know. Now you and Tom go play
with you're signatures...cuty pies.
Ken



.

Relevant Pages